Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+tube\s+anode\s+cap\,\s+etc\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+tube\s+anode\s+cap\,\s+etc\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] tube anode cap, etc. (score: 1): Author: jtml@lanl.gov (John Lyles); Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 10:13:28 -0700; First, I have to comment on Jon's stark question: Isn't it nice? The way a mailing list ought to be.... This reflector is much like tuning across 20 meters sometimes. I suppose that's good, but it su; /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00178.html (11,165 bytes)
2. [AMPS] tube anode cap, etc. (score: 1): Author: w3am@juno.com (w3am@juno.com); Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 11:00:18 -0700; JTML: If no one else is interested, I'd be happy to put your pix up on my server account, along with a link from my page if you like. It may not be AM, but we can dream... 73, Gary W3AM -- FAQ on WW; /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00179.html (7,219 bytes)
3. [AMPS] tube anode cap, etc. (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 14 Jan 99 12:09:14 -0600; Yeah, you're right. I've just been on other reflectors that would tend to hiccup and some folks would not get any messages. Reid could probably help but since Eimac doesn't support the tube anymore; /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00180.html (11,265 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]