Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+staggered\s+resonance\s+effects\s+in\s+VHF\s+suppressors\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+staggered\s+resonance\s+effects\s+in\s+VHF\s+suppressors\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] staggered resonance effects in VHF suppressors (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 11:25:17 +0100; Rich replied: I'm having trouble following this. It appears to say that the suppressor choke should be made to be self resonant at the same frequency as the parasitic resonance circuit, and then damp; /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00168.html (7,867 bytes)
2. [AMPS] staggered resonance effects in VHF suppressors (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Tue, 16 Jun 98 14:03:29 -0800; No. The two anode-circuit resonances have nothing to do with the self-resonance of Lsup. Typical anode-circuits resonate at 60 - 160 MHz. Typical, 100nH Lsups for 1000w amplifiers self-resonate abov; /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00174.html (8,186 bytes)
3. [AMPS] staggered resonance effects in VHF suppressors (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 22:24:10 +0100; Peter, G3RZP sends his apologies: he'll be away from work for some days with sciatica, and will have to miss the rest of this interesting discussion. 73 from Ian G3SEK -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.conte; /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00205.html (7,216 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]