- 1. [AMPS] rice burners/3rd order imd (score: 1)
- Author: irosky@yahoo.com (igor rosky)
- Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 23:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
- My only commenton all these small radios is that they generally have poor 3rd order imd. Many stations are starting to use these radios with KW amps at home, the splatter is horrendous. We have this
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00059.html (7,886 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] rice burners/3rd order imd (score: 1)
- Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
- Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 08:37:33 +0100
- With everyone using 706s, how do you tell if it's the receiver or transmitter causing the splatter? Steve -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Adminis
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00062.html (8,148 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] rice burners/3rd order imd (score: 1)
- Author: ykata@ma.mailbank.ne.jp (Yoshihisa Katakura)
- Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 20:45:52 +0900
- dravstvujte,Igor. I've actually seen some amps in Vladivostok. They're using GU-74b tetrodes in zero bias GG (both grids are grounded) without input matching. This is the reason of their signal quali
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00069.html (7,786 bytes)
- 4. [AMPS] rice burners/3rd order imd (score: 1)
- Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick)
- Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 12:59:42 +0100
- So how far down should IMD products be? Typically, professional practice is -31dB rel PEP at the final amp output for SSB. Is this probably OK for the majority of amateur applications at HF? For ISB,
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00070.html (7,591 bytes)
- 5. [AMPS] rice burners/3rd order imd (score: 1)
- Author: G3CWI@aol.com (G3CWI@aol.com)
- Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 13:06:18 EDT
- I had always thought that IMD was a technique used by major contest stations to keep a clear space around their frequency... -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@con
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-05/msg00107.html (7,104 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu