Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+another\s+myth\s+on\s+EMF\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] another myth on EMF (score: 1)
Author: jtml@lanl.gov (John T. M. Lyles)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 09:39:12 -0700
Cellphones cause brain tumors...... In study after study, the link of 800-1800 MHz RF emissions to cancer has NOT been scientifically proven. RF heating, some affects on nerves, auditory affects at p
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00048.html (9,759 bytes)

2. [AMPS] another myth on EMF (score: 1)
Author: Peter.Chadwick@zarlink.com (Peter Chadwick)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 16:55:12 -0000
Further to John's comment, with which I wholly agree... In 1994, the BBC presented a paper to CEPT Project Team SE21, in which they looked at the field strengths of TV signals in London. The 4 TV cha
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00050.html (9,408 bytes)

3. [AMPS] another myth on EMF (score: 1)
Author: shr@ricc.net (Signal Hill Ranch)
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 10:45:37 -0700
I am reluctant to wade in on a discussion such as this, but as most of you know, the methodology of doing these types of correlations is very prone to error. And as proof, I offer one quick story. My
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00051.html (9,532 bytes)

4. [AMPS] another myth on EMF (score: 1)
Author: bjk@ihug.co.nz (Barry Kirkwood)
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 06:40:05 +1300
My 02c. worth: I am reasonably persuaded that the biological effects on adult humans from being subjected to strong rf fields in the vlf-hf region are minimal. As has been pointed out whole poulation
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00052.html (13,200 bytes)

5. [AMPS] another myth on EMF (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 10:42:55 -0800
There is little doubt that operating high-powered amateur amplifiers directly and negatively impacts its users' health, e.g.: -I have dropped a 170 lb amplifier on my foot, and although did not break
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00053.html (16,182 bytes)

6. [AMPS] another myth on EMF (score: 1)
Author: k7fm@teleport.com (Colin Lamb)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 12:35:53 -0800
Some people disbelieve that EMF is hazardous, but they must be blind. If you doubt this, just wait until high noon and look up at the sun. The EMF force is so strong that it will burn out your retina
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00055.html (9,060 bytes)

7. [AMPS] another myth on EMF (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 13:20:21 -0800
// Without an explanation of how it was flawed, your explanation is want. // I too was a bit skeptical when, in 1986, Eimac's Mr. W.B. Foote told me about gold evaporation/gold-meltballs because I k
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00056.html (11,303 bytes)

8. [AMPS] another myth on EMF (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 13:20:22 -0800
// From personal experience, I know that RF cann npt cavse brane danage dameg bray daqec lhg. // A common misconception. evidence' in the The ringing seems to cause much of the problem. About two ye
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00057.html (11,623 bytes)

9. [AMPS] another myth on EMF (score: 1)
Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 15:37:28 -0600
It has been a known fact for many years that after about 75-90 years of exposure to solar radiation, people tend to drop dead. (((73))) Phil, K5PC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps S
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00058.html (9,020 bytes)

10. [AMPS] another myth on EMF (score: 1)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 21:16:37 +0000
The methodology is to stick a pin in the map and draw a circle round it. Then you count the number of cancers inside that circle and compare with the national average. If you draw a circle big enough
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00059.html (10,547 bytes)

11. [AMPS] another myth on EMF (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 13:51:58 -0800
W6EDD's daughter died from exposure to solar radiation in her 20s. A friend died from it in his 30s. cheers, Phil - R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00060.html (9,312 bytes)

12. [AMPS] another myth on EMF (score: 1)
Author: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 15:55:07 -0600
There ARE exceptions. I was using average life expectancy. I was also trying to inject humor...better stick to my day job! (((73))) Phil, K5PC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submi
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00061.html (9,033 bytes)

13. [AMPS] another myth on EMF (score: 1)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Mike)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 21:49:21 -0800
Bravo, John! Very well stated. This emotionally loaded topic seems to surface from time-to-time on the various reflectors with the usual one-sided political knee-jerking coming from both sides of the
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00062.html (11,939 bytes)

14. [AMPS] another myth on EMF (score: 1)
Author: k7fm@teleport.com (Lamb)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 22:09:50 -0800
A number of years ago, one of the local counties was considering an amateur radio tower ordinance. It probably would have sailed through smoothly, but one ham in particular annoyed his neighbors and
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00063.html (8,881 bytes)

15. [AMPS] another myth on EMF (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 03:03:12 -0800
// Excellent, chortles Colin. Thanks, - Sulphur Mountain overlooks the posh Ojai Valley in Ventura County, California where a number of Hollywood "stars" have homes. The FAA decided to build a radar
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00064.html (10,453 bytes)

16. [AMPS] another myth on EMF (score: 1)
Author: g8gsq@qsl.net (Steve Thompson)
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 11:25:29 -0000
--Original Message-- From: 2 <2@vc.net> To: Lamb <k7fm@teleport.com>; Mike <W4EF@dellroy.com>; AMPS <amps@contesting.com>; John T. M. Lyles <jtml@lanl.gov> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 06 November
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00065.html (9,973 bytes)

17. [AMPS] another myth on EMF (score: 1)
Author: Peter.Chadwick@zarlink.com (Peter Chadwick)
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 11:51:35 -0000
The radar at Heathrow airport is supposedly about +93dBW EIRP (that's QRO - even by John Lyle's standards!) at around 1230MHz. It's been there for a good many years, and thus workers at Heathrow must
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00067.html (9,431 bytes)

18. [AMPS] another myth on EMF (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 04:46:53 -0800
/ Does +93dBW = 1993 megawatts? / High power at 24cm would be especially dangerous to persons c. 12cm tall. Lepreuchuans beware. cheers, Peter - R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/meas
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00070.html (8,796 bytes)

19. [AMPS] another myth on EMF (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 04:46:55 -0800
To: <amps@contesting.com> ? Sounds dangerous. ? As I understand it, copper/cotton thread blend briefs pretty much solves the reproduction problem. cheers, Steve - R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K,
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00071.html (10,221 bytes)

20. [AMPS] another myth on EMF (score: 1)
Author: Peter.Chadwick@zarlink.com (Peter Chadwick)
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 12:44:56 -0000
Yup. There's about 500kW to 1MW of RF out of the waveguide, as I understand it. Pulse, of course, but even so, the average is reasonably high with that much peak power. It's a cosec squared antenna,
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00072.html (9,202 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu