Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Watt\s+meters\s+and\s+PEP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Watt\s+meters\s+and\s+PEP\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Watt meters and PEP (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 14:40:45 -1000; Interesting topic on the amps reflector about the definition of the FCC's 1500 watt PEP limit for amateurs. Have a look at: http://www.pldi.net/~fisher/ Note the equation for PEP, as apparently under; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00243.html (11,174 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Watt meters and PEP (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser - W6RU); Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 21:41:09 -0800; §97.3 Definitions. (b) The definitions of technical symbols used in this Part are: (6) PEP (peak envelope power). The average power supplied to the antenna transmission line by a transmitter dur; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00246.html (8,567 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Watt meters and PEP (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 08:20:00 +0000; That's right. I'm not familiar with the way that instrument actually measures RF power, but it seems likely that it is *calibrated* using CW and a standard wattmeter. The statement about "peak voltag; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00249.html (14,461 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Watt meters and PEP (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 08:27:25 +0000; The FCC definition is exactly correct. It is the "average power supplied during one RF cycle". That is the definition of "power" in any AC/RF waveform. Two things are varying on very different timesc; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00250.html (9,834 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Watt meters and PEP (score: 1): Author: DAVED@ctilidar.com (Dave D'Epagnier); Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 08:28:22 -0700; Hey Ian, what do you make of all these audio amplifier manufacturers specifying their equipment output power to be in rms Watts? This doesn't make sense to me. I always thought Watts was average powe; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00254.html (11,022 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Watt meters and PEP (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:18:22 -0700; ? RMS is equivalent DC heating ability. For example, with a sine-wave, 200w-pk would have the heating ability of 100DC watts. . cheers, Dave - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ o; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00258.html (8,879 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Watt meters and PEP (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser - W6RU); Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:32:44 -0800; Thanks to all that helped me with this .... I can see more clearly now ... gotta clean my glasses ... clear the head. Terry average -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions:; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00260.html (9,384 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Watt meters and PEP (score: 1): Author: DAVED@ctilidar.com (Dave D'Epagnier); Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:57:12 -0700; A 200w peak signal into a 1 ohm load would have a voltage amplitude of 14.14volts. The average power would be Vrms squared / R or 100v/1ohm = 100Watts. This is average power, which is the dc equivale; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00263.html (9,878 bytes)
9. [AMPS] Watt meters and PEP (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:11:58 +0000; Me neither. Perhaps a certain hi-fi journalist could comment? 73 from Ian G3SEK Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book' 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.demon.co.uk/g3sek -- FAQ on; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00264.html (8,806 bytes)
10. [AMPS] Watt meters and PEP (score: 1): Author: kc4slk@csrlink.net (Mike Sawyer); Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:53:22 -0500; This might be too simplistic (which I think it is but what the hell!). But turning the "Wayback Machine" to the time I took basic electricity and electronics in High School, I remember being taught t; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00270.html (12,719 bytes)
11. [AMPS] Watt meters and PEP (score: 1): Author: fisher@pldi.net (Fisher); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 16:39:11 -0000; correct Maybe it is simplistic, for me though, this is one of those areas where I've had to "clean my glasses ... clear the head" a bunch of times (""borrowed from Terry W6RU). But first, don't forge; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00283.html (11,750 bytes)
12. [AMPS] Watt meters and PEP (score: 1): Author: John_Nelson@compuserve.com (John Nelson); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 14:40:38 -0500; Message text written by "Ian White, G3SEK" If that was a reference to my good self, I'm no longer a hi-fi journalist within the meaning of the act -- chiefly because consumer audio nowadays is domina; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00284.html (9,345 bytes)
13. [AMPS] Watt meters and PEP (score: 1): Author: warrenw@pentek.com (Warren J. Walsh); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 14:54:01 -0500; Gee sort of sounds like a well know Amateur Radio Organization magazine! -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@c; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00285.html (9,606 bytes)
14. [AMPS] Watt meters and PEP (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 10:51:08 -1000; I thought the following input was especially good, helped me! More words on the topic, but useful: "Set up and operate the rig such that you measure 1500 watts into a dummy load on a Bird or equivale; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00286.html (11,103 bytes)
15. [AMPS] Watt meters and PEP (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 20:47:17 +0000; I hadn't realised that - I'm sorry that your technical honesty drove you out. But since you've de-cloaked, John, please could you tell us what the hifi industry purports to mean by "watts RMS" and "m; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00289.html (8,852 bytes)
16. [AMPS] Watt meters and PEP (score: 1): Author: kh7m@hsa-kauai.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 13:03:35 -1000; Earlier, John, GW4RFX wrote, in part: I have always believed that Paul Klipsch was among the most honest spokesman and designers of equipment for the true high fidelity reproduction of audio. I do no; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00294.html (13,729 bytes)
17. [AMPS] Watt meters and PEP (score: 1): Author: phil@vaxxine.com (Phil T. (VA3UX)); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 22:42:11 -0500; BRAVO !! Here here ! Well written John. Phil -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owne; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00304.html (9,697 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]