Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+WTB\s+kaput\s+8877\s+from\s+AL\-1500\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+WTB\s+kaput\s+8877\s+from\s+AL\-1500\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] WTB kaput 8877 from AL-1500. (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 19:36:26 -0700; The first 8877 dud I tested from an AL-1500 apparently failed from gold-sputtering. (see 'A letter from Eimac' near end of my Web site) I would like to purchase another AL-1500 dud and test it. // I; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00810.html (6,939 bytes)
2. [AMPS] WTB kaput 8877 from AL-1500. (score: 1): Author: hkman@hitter.net (Pat Poirier); Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 18:56:07 -0400; How did you determine that the 8877 was a dud, due to gold-sputtering ?? Did you disassemble the tube, cut it in half or hi pot test only ?? You used the word apparently failed, do you know that to b; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00821.html (8,625 bytes)
3. [AMPS] WTB kaput 8877 from AL-1500. (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 17:16:44 -0700; The negative anode leakage was virtually zero. The positve anode leakage was higher. I removed the anode cooler by cuttin the sheet metal just above the solder joint to the ceramic insulator. There; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00823.html (10,359 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]