Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Transceivers\s+high\s+3rd\s+order\s+IMD\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Transceivers\s+high\s+3rd\s+order\s+IMD\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Transceivers high 3rd order IMD (score: 1): Author: irosky@yahoo.com (igor rosky); Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 06:02:53 -0800 (PST); Thanks to all who replied. What is the standards for military communications SSB transmitters. I have heard the US coast guard fire up on 13mhz with 10kw and the signal was huge, but just so clean an; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00498.html (7,706 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Transceivers high 3rd order IMD (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 14:27:40 -0000; The nearest professional standard equivalent to the amateur service is the maritime service. Here the standard is -31dB rel PEP, -25dB rel tone.(There's an ETSI Standard, I think it's ETS 300-377) Fo; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00500.html (8,495 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Transceivers high 3rd order IMD (score: 1): Author: n3hrt@us.hsanet.net (Martin Gary); Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:19:26 -0500; I used to work on HF transmitters for the Navy. Military transmitters have to meet the following standards: You test the transmitter by injecting two tones on ssb - 1000 and 1625 Hz. 3rd order IMD -; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00502.html (8,551 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Transceivers high 3rd order IMD (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 13:56:43 -0500; The AB1 spec at 2KV is 335ma per tube. In AB2 at 2.5KV it is 400ma. Must have had to in order to keep the The stock AB2 NCL-2000 ran -28dB. With the G3SEK screen regulator and biased closer to AB1 t; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00537.html (9,288 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]