Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+TRW\s+PT6702\s+or\s+PT6747\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+TRW\s+PT6702\s+or\s+PT6747\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] TRW PT6702 or PT6747? (score: 1): Author: wc6w@juno.com (Radio WC6W); Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 13:45:11 EDT; Happy Sunday Morning (at least where I am...) Does anyone happen to know the specifications for either the TRW PT6702 or PT6747 RF power transistors? I surmise that they are late 60's vintage VHF par; /archives//html/Amps/1999-04/msg00338.html (7,293 bytes)
2. [AMPS] TRW PT6702 or PT6747? (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 10:28:04 +0100; I think that the PT numbers were mostly customer specific, either in testing or for commercial disguise although the actual transistors were usually generic types. A few PT parts made it to general s; /archives//html/Amps/1999-04/msg00367.html (7,633 bytes)
3. [AMPS] TRW PT6702 or PT6747? (score: 1): Author: johnf@futurenet.co.za (John Fielding); Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 18:10:57 +0200; PT was one of the prefixes used for TRW RF parts (others were J0 and MRA), some were custom parts but the vast majority were for general sale. I can't say I recognise the numbers listed but they may; /archives//html/Amps/1999-04/msg00372.html (9,111 bytes)
4. [AMPS] TRW PT6702 or PT6747? (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 10:15:35 +0100; I've had a look in the Motorola book - they aren't in there. 73 Peter G3RZP To: <amps@contesting.com> -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrat; /archives//html/Amps/1999-04/msg00378.html (10,472 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]