Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Splatter\s+avoidance\s+$was\s+4cx10000$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Splatter\s+avoidance\s+$was\s+4cx10000$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Splatter avoidance (was 4cx10000) (score: 1): Author: k8cc@ix.netcom.com (David A. Pruett); Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 11:59:15 -0400; I see Jan's point - if your normal signal is operating around 1500W with a tube such as a 4CX10000 which can handle the leading edge spikes generated by some of the modern radios, less splatter will; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00178.html (8,393 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Splatter avoidance (was 4cx10000) (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 09:44:22 +0100; of problems. Only with a badly designed radio - unfortunately, very few modern rigs are well behaved at low powers, but they should be designed to be so. 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.cont; /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00200.html (7,112 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]