Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+SB\s+220\s+on\s+6\s+meter\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+SB\s+220\s+on\s+6\s+meter\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] SB 220 on 6 meter (score: 1): Author: will@madlabs.com (Willem Angenent); Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 12:47:22 -0700; -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com; /archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00011.html (7,471 bytes)
2. [AMPS] SB 220 on 6 meter (score: 1): Author: harryhbrown@earthlink.net (Harry Brown); Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 22:40:10 -0400; Check out the following page: http://www.agate.net/~ns1z/sb220.html Looks pretty complete to me. Has lots of photos. 73, Harry, W3IIT -- At 12:47 PM 5/1/2001 -0700, Willem Angenent wrote: <center>Vis; /archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00018.html (8,495 bytes)
3. [AMPS] SB 220 on 6 meter (score: 1): Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (michael watts); Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 21:06:52 -0700 (PDT); I have a (slightly non-sequiter) question: why do I always see stuff about the SB220 but never ANYTHING about the SB221? I have the SB221. I never have even seen one for sale - even on eBay. Anybody; /archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00019.html (7,850 bytes)
4. [AMPS] SB 220 on 6 meter (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 07:11:28 -0700; ? The SB-220 has a 5-pos. bandswitch and a 10m pi input instead of 4-pos. and no 10m pi input. The missing bandswitch contact can be added with #0-80 hardware. // The 220 has a Tune-C that usually b; /archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00023.html (8,948 bytes)
5. [AMPS] SB 220 on 6 meter (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 15:20:59 +0100; Leaving aside the fact that I know the expression as 'teats on a bull', doesn't this comment appear to apply to nearly all, if not all, ALC systems? The ones in amplifiers mostly seem to work on the; /archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00024.html (7,779 bytes)
6. [AMPS] SB 220 on 6 meter (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 08:24:20 -0700; pig Yes stable door Well put, Peter. However the ALC jack provides a useful means of controlling the amplifier with a low v DC signal - such as with ICOM radios. cheers - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.; /archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00025.html (7,933 bytes)
7. [AMPS] SB 220 on 6 meter (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 12:27:52 -0400; Group delay in the RF chain is very small, so ALC should work well from an external PA if the system is designed correctly. The problem is the radios. The response time of external ALC ports is gene; /archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00027.html (8,190 bytes)
8. [AMPS] SB 220 on 6 meter (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 17:56:46 +0100; This is what I meant by the 'phase response' - I suspect that usually they've got the group delay problems, so have tpo slow down the ALC to try and keep it stable. Aye, there's the rub!! You only ha; /archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00028.html (7,865 bytes)
9. [AMPS] SB 220 on 6 meter (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 10:04:10 -0700; ? yea, verily. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contestin; /archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00030.html (7,769 bytes)
10. [AMPS] SB 220 on 6 meter (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 13:15:28 -0400; It seems designing an accurate transmitter ALC system is more art than science. If the ALC is too fast as in the stock Ten-Tec Omni Six, one encounters leading edge envelope distortion, particularly; /archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00031.html (8,150 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]