Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+SB\-1000\s+WARC\s+usage\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+SB\-1000\s+WARC\s+usage\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] SB-1000 WARC usage (score: 1): Author: rakefet@rakefet.com (Vic Rosenthal); Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 11:46:56 -0700; I have the following problem with my SB-1000: Although the plate circuit tunes 18 mhz in the 21 mhz position and 24 mhz in the 28 mhz position, it's not possible to adjust the input tuned circuit so; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00613.html (8,138 bytes)
2. [AMPS] SB-1000 WARC usage (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 02:03:07 EDT; On Thu, 28 May 1998 11:46:56 -0700 Vic Rosenthal <rakefet@rakefet.com> writes: The rest snipped... Why not just duplicate the almost clone post WARC AL-80A circuit? Dunno if there is even a differenc; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00627.html (8,137 bytes)
3. [AMPS] SB-1000 WARC usage (score: 1): Author: rakefet@rakefet.com (Vic Rosenthal); Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 08:29:27 -0700; Good idea -- I've got the schematic for my SB-1000, and the AL80B parts list is on Ameritron's web site -- perhaps their input components are slightly different; I'll check. I'm already using an Amer; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00643.html (7,934 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]