Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\s+question\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Re question (score: 1): Author: Peter.Chadwick@gpsemi.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 14:37:03 -0000; Tom, you say Isn't the Bird slug the same? There's mutual inductance between the centre of the coax line and the slug, and similarly there's capacitance between the line and the slug. The analysis of; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00243.html (7,476 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Re question (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Tue, 18 Nov 97 10:49:10 -0800; Amen, Peter. (distant laughter). - I propose a simple test to see if Rich is guilty of wanton and reckless technoblathering: 1. Measure the forward and reflected power on a transmission line with ro; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00247.html (8,206 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Re question (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net); Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 07:17:51 +0000; Exactly the same. I can't think of how to make one that isn't the same. The all respond to the SUM of line voltage and current. Within the published accuracy of the meter (+ or - 5% of FS anywhere o; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00282.html (7,643 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Re question (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 08:57:28 EST; On Thu, 20 Nov 1997 07:17:51 +0000 w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net writes: Tom or others: Has anyone converted a 50 Ohm Bird slug to 75 Ohm use? Bird used to sell a 75 Ohm version of the 43 but h; /archives//html/Amps/1997-11/msg00287.html (7,858 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]