- 1. [AMPS] Re: bias question (score: 1)
- Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se)
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 10:55:24 +0200
- Fellows, thank´s a lot for the input on my question. I understand this much better now. Sure wasn´t as simple as I thought but what is these days. I did find the G3SEK bias circuit on the
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00233.html (7,237 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] Re: bias question (score: 1)
- Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick)
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 10:27:10 +0100
- Sorry, guys, I cannot continue contributing to this thread because of certain IP (Intellectual Property, NOT intermod. product!) issues concerned with developments here at work. 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00234.html (7,089 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] Re: bias question (score: 1)
- Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 12:16:18 -0400
- Jim, A long time ago I used a vertical antenna mounted above my yagi as a transmitting antenna, and received on the yagi. The vertical way up in the air was only about 7 or 8 dB weaker than my 5 ele
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00245.html (7,593 bytes)
- 4. [AMPS] Re: bias question (score: 1)
- Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 07:33:07 +0100
- Fellows, thank´s a lot for the input on my question. I understand this much better now. Sure wasn´t as simple as I thought but what is these days. I did find the G3SEK bias circuit on the
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00271.html (8,261 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu