Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+TopBand\:\s+160m\s+shunt\s+feeds\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+TopBand\:\s+160m\s+shunt\s+feeds\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Re: TopBand: 160m shunt feeds (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 21:11:20 EDT; Although it obviously radiates Bill, I question the efficiency of a #12 wire 4' away from a large tower cross section. Do you have anything to show that this is a correct d1/d2 ratio and spacing? It; /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00288.html (8,713 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Re: TopBand: 160m shunt feeds (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net); Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 23:27:07 +0000; To: <amps@contesting.com> Hi Carl, While a larger conductor would have less loss, the loss is so low to begin with you could never notice the change. Loss is only due to resistive losses, reactances; /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00291.html (9,396 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]