Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+TL\-922\s+on\s+3\.5\s+MHz\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+TL\-922\s+on\s+3\.5\s+MHz\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Re: TL-922 on 3.5 MHz (score: 1): Author: tdsrhs@cbn.net.id (RS); Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 21:54:14 +0700; My TL-922 is not American version I believe (NOT TL-922A). 1. The band switch has 1.8, 3.5, 7, 14, 21, 28 and all band is working in the stock form. The problem I noticed is on the 3,5 Mhz. While the; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00676.html (10,090 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Re: TL-922 on 3.5 MHz (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 09:16:46 -0800; For linear operation, the tubes need a ZSAC of c. 75mA each. For AØ tuneup, tune/load a TL-922 on the CW tap. What did you do to "turn down the plate"? Not long. The HV transformer is good fo; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00681.html (8,137 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Re: TL-922 on 3.5 MHz (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:44:18 -0500; You could have RF feedback, caused by common mode current on the feedline or poor station grounding or lead routing. The antenna might be too close to the operating position for the RF immunity of y; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00684.html (10,750 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]