Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+RF\s+Amplifier\s+Discussion\s+Digest\s+V3\s+\#451\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+RF\s+Amplifier\s+Discussion\s+Digest\s+V3\s+\#451\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Re: RF Amplifier Discussion Digest V3 #451 (score: 1): Author: w4th@webtv.net (Tom Hix W4TH); Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 20:58:23 -0600 (CST); In responce to SM5KI question == One important question is, why they did not they make copies of the excellent 88 family (8877, 8874 etc) and why did not the proposed 3-600Z come out from Svetlana? L; /archives//html/Amps/2000-11/msg00228.html (7,495 bytes)
2. SV: [AMPS] Re: RF Amplifier Discussion Digest V3 #451 (score: 1): Author: sm5ki@algonet.se (sm5ki); Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 08:51:12 +0100; Tnx Tom: Its really crazy that we here in Stockholm cannot buy new Svetlana tubes straight from the factory so close to us. Should be much cheaper than buying from Svetlanas US sales organisation. Wh; /archives//html/Amps/2000-11/msg00231.html (8,649 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]