Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+\[BitBucket\]\s+Ameritron\/MFJ\s+Reflector\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Re\:\s+\[BitBucket\]\s+Ameritron\/MFJ\s+Reflector\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Re: [BitBucket] Ameritron/MFJ Reflector (score: 1): Author: n4xse@amsat.org (Michael Spencer); Date: Mon, 24 Mar 1997 11:41:20 -0500 (EST); Brian, I wish I knew why this amp and others from the same company get a bad rap in some quarters. It is true that I have not used one, and maybe this will make the difference, but I have been doing; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00220.html (7,788 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Re: [BitBucket] Ameritron/MFJ Reflector (score: 1): Author: wrt@eskimo.com (Bill Turner); Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 03:07:09 GMT; -- Ok, you've hit my hot button. I have an Ameritron AL-1200 which I would rate as a fair piece of gear, but with some caveats: 1. When I received it, the safety interlock switch on the top cover was; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00226.html (11,678 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Re: [BitBucket] Ameritron/MFJ Reflector (score: 1): Author: ni6t@scruznet.com (Garry & Yelena); Date: Mon, 24 Mar 1997 20:58:56 -1000; I think your comments tell the story of why Ameritron/MFJ has the reputation for something less than military quality. For me, a telling moment was to be on the main floor of Hara Arena at Dayton loo; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00227.html (10,035 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Re: [BitBucket] Ameritron/MFJ Reflector (score: 1): Author: w8jitom@worldnet.att.net (Tom Rauch (W8JI)); Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 14:07:58 -0500; Not actually. Your letter resulted in correcting of a wiring jig, and that problem was corrected. It was caused by the step-start relay coil shunting the path for the supply interlock. You are correc; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00237.html (15,316 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]