Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+RE\:\s+FETAMP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+RE\:\s+FETAMP\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] RE: FETAMP (score: 1): Author: watson@epiloglaser.com (George K. Watson); Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 11:55:32 -0700; Would you need the buck converter if running from a 220volt AC line? I think for the sake of the parts, yes. I will present two application scenarios where I think this is a good idea: Let's say that; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00186.html (8,115 bytes)
2. [AMPS] RE: FETAMP (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 09:09:50 -0000; George, What sort of Vdd are you thinking of? Accepted that a high Vdd has advantages in a higher output impedance and somewhat lower currents (presumably making transformers easier because the leaka; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00198.html (7,932 bytes)
3. [AMPS] RE: FETAMP (score: 1): Author: watson@epiloglaser.com (George K. Watson); Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 08:49:18 -0700; I am starting with 125V out of the buck converter. The VDD max of the parts I am using is 500V so I am not pushing this parameter at all. This supply voltage is only a little over twice that of conv; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00206.html (8,591 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]