Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Q\s+is\s+meaningless\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Q\s+is\s+meaningless\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Q is meaningless (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 18:39:19 -0400; To: <amps@contesting.com> That's true. The Q of the suppressor is a meaningless number when trying to decide if it is effective or not, or useful or not. One thing is safe to say. Nichrome suppressor; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00567.html (8,543 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Q is meaningless (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 17:32:04 -0700; To: <amps@contesting.com> ? Q is important because it is directly related to Rp -- the variable that determines VHF amplification. (see Wes' measurements) later, Tom - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcn; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00572.html (7,868 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]