Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Pulse\s+rating\s+in\s+vacuum\s+tubes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Pulse\s+rating\s+in\s+vacuum\s+tubes\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Pulse rating in vacuum tubes (score: 1): Author: k1ta@earthlink.net (Bob Marston); Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 19:35:49 -0700; Hi All Been on the list for 10 monthes now and have a question that been gnawing at me for quite sone time that I have not seen answered. It deals with the P rating given to vacuum tubes for pulse se; /archives//html/Amps/1998-07/msg00095.html (7,441 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Pulse rating in vacuum tubes (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 16 Jul 98 20:09:16 -0800; Pulse rated versions typically have a longer anode insulator to increase the withstanding V capability. Other than that, they seem to be similar to plain vanilla versions. Rich... R. L. Measures, 80; /archives//html/Amps/1998-07/msg00096.html (7,592 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Pulse rating in vacuum tubes (score: 1): Author: gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU (George T. Daughters); Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 08:43:40 +0008; hi all, bob wrote.... i asked these same questions of an eimac engineer several (ok, many) years ago. as i recall, his reply was that they were the same tube. they could even be from the same product; /archives//html/Amps/1998-07/msg00100.html (7,906 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]