Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Plate\s+chokes\s+Value\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Plate\s+chokes\s+Value\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Plate chokes Value (score: 1): Author: andy_m_99@yahoo.com (john merryman); Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 05:14:33 -0800 (PST); What is a good starting value for a plate choke? i have averaged the various chokes in the different handbooks for different amps, 60uh 110 by far the most popular of coarse i will dip and check for; /archives//html/Amps/1998-12/msg00422.html (7,215 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Plate chokes Value (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 06:04:04 -0800; ? Use enough L to limit the AC current through the choke on the lowest freq. of operation to no more than the DC current through the choke. . There is a discussion of HV-RFCs in "Amplifiers" on my W; /archives//html/Amps/1998-12/msg00423.html (7,050 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Plate chokes Value (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 11:03:06 -0500; That is a fairly decent value and was what B&W used in their 160-10M 802. That one is not easy to duplicate since it uses a threaded form. I pretty much stick with a homebrew 188uh that I have detail; /archives//html/Amps/1998-12/msg00425.html (8,601 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]