Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Parallel\s+coaxial\s+feedline\s+For\s+1\/2\s+Characteristic\s+Impedance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Parallel\s+coaxial\s+feedline\s+For\s+1\/2\s+Characteristic\s+Impedance\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Parallel coaxial feedline For 1/2 Characteristic Impedance (score: 1): Author: billydeanward@hotmail.com (Billy Ward); Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 05:03:57 -0000; Greetings Group, I would like to have this group's input on something that I have been working on today. Today was not the first time that I've toyed with this idea but I performed the experiments ag; /archives//html/Amps/2000-12/msg00252.html (9,904 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Parallel coaxial feedline For 1/2 Characteristic Impedance (score: 1): Author: wc6w@juno.com (Radio WC6W); Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 01:52:37 EST; <snip> 36-Ohms <snip> Hi Billy Yes, that is theoretically correct plus, as you proved, it works fine in the real world too! It's too bad that there isn't an analogous way to connect two cables in "se; /archives//html/Amps/2000-12/msg00255.html (8,083 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Parallel coaxial feedline For 1/2 Characteristic Impedance (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 02:46:43 -0500; Hi Billy, Everything is fine, except you did not cut the cable loss in half since the line is 1/4 wl long and since the losses are not entirely copper losses. If the line is very short, and if all lo; /archives//html/Amps/2000-12/msg00256.html (10,269 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]