Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+My\s+try\s+at\s+unravelling\s+the\s+knotty\s+VHF\-Rp\s+Enigma\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+My\s+try\s+at\s+unravelling\s+the\s+knotty\s+VHF\-Rp\s+Enigma\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] My try at unravelling the knotty VHF-Rp Enigma (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 14 May 98 10:52:36 -0800; In Wes' (copyright 1997 by W. D. Stewart, Jr. The material maybe be freely distributed for non-commercial use if proper credit is given.) measurements, in the Notes, Wes states: "Column 8 is the meas; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00233.html (7,870 bytes)
2. [AMPS] My try at unravelling the knotty VHF-Rp Enigma (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 22:41:21 +0100; Rp is the APPARENT parallel resistance of the whole network, as measured between the analyser terminals. In an idealized parallel R-L network (no other sources of losses, no stray inductances or capa; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00237.html (8,381 bytes)
3. [AMPS] My try at unravelling the knotty VHF-Rp Enigma (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 14 May 98 17:19:32 -0500; I think this has been what Rich has been trying to say all along. Lower Rp means lower VHF gain. Rich's supressor inductors are lossy and so as you say: losses in the L tend to make Rp lower. Works; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00239.html (7,993 bytes)
4. [AMPS] My try at unravelling the knotty VHF-Rp Enigma (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Fri, 15 May 98 03:35:56 -0800; The numbers indicate otherwise. Is it reasonable that a 100-ohm suppressor R would measure: 100-ohms on a DMM, 49-ohms at 10MHz (where Ls losses are minimal), 102-ohms at 100MHz, and 104-ohms at 200; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00256.html (8,584 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]