Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Low\s+efficiency\s+from\s+AM6155\s+on\s+432\s+MHz\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Low\s+efficiency\s+from\s+AM6155\s+on\s+432\s+MHz\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Low efficiency from AM6155 on 432 MHz (score: 1): Author: m.j.willis@rl.ac.uk (Mike Willis); Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 09:04:21 +0100; I have now got an AM6155 running on 432MHz using the W3RJW mods to the RF cavity (need a new blower BTW) but although I get 300mA of anode current from a few watts of drive, I can not get more than 1; /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00130.html (7,415 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Low efficiency from AM6155 on 432 MHz (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Thu, 11 Jun 1998 07:44:16 +0100; It reads as if the anode load impedance is way too low. I doubt it - one reason for using silver is that silver oxide is a conductor, albeit not as good as the pure thing. Steve -- FAQ on WWW: http:/; /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00144.html (7,876 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]