Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Hold\s+on\s+\-\s+SWR\s+meter\s+placement\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Hold\s+on\s+\-\s+SWR\s+meter\s+placement\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1): Author: phil@vaxxine.com (Phil T. (VA3UX)); Date: Tue, 05 Oct 1999 22:05:19; Hold on a minute gents. I've been waiting for this to slow down a bit before commenting on one item only. Jon has said that SWR is constant regardless of line length or position of the SWR meter (wit; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00215.html (10,534 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Wed, 6 Oct 99 13:25:00 -0500; Thank you. In the real world, perhaps not. But everything specified has been ideal. In the real world, we have things such as imperfections in our cables causing impedance discontinuities, we have PL; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00233.html (9,234 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1): Author: w7iuv@axtek.com (Larry Molitor); Date: Thu, 07 Oct 1999 23:27:23 +0100; Jon, I have to second that motion. I recall reading the text in question. I don't remember much about it, except that I questioned it's application in the real "real world". I should dig that out and; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00263.html (9,733 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 17:26:53 -0700; ? In a slotted line, when the swr is less than perfect, the voltage on the line varies with position. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfa; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00269.html (9,174 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 21:54:13 -0500; Yes. It's been about 10 to 12 years ago in a measurements class in college. Back then the 8510B was the best network analyzer HP made. We began the class with the concept of impedance and VSWR measur; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00275.html (11,733 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 21:58:01 -0500; What is "less than perfect" SWR, Rich? I thought SWR was a ratio of max voltage to min voltage on the line. What is meant by "less than perfect"? Jon KE9NA -- Jon Ogden KE9NA http://www.qsl.net/ke9na; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00277.html (8,920 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 22:34:43 -0700; More than 1 to 1. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contes; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00282.html (8,994 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Fri, 8 Oct 99 09:40:54 -0500; perfect"? Actually, now that I re-read your original comment, I agree and disagree. With VSWR of greater than 1:1, the voltage on the line does vary with position. I thought I said that when I talked; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00294.html (10,042 bytes)
9. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Fri, 8 Oct 99 09:52:42 -0500; Still insisting on YOUR wives tale, Rich? All the rest of us and all of the textbooks that talk about VSWR are wrong? Look at it another way. If I run 100 Watts into a transmission line that is LOSSL; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00295.html (10,297 bytes)
10. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 11:19:22 -0400; on max perfect"? Any SWR that doesn't behave as Rich would like ;o) 73 Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-R; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00297.html (9,457 bytes)
11. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Fri, 8 Oct 99 10:27:51 -0500; OOPS! This message was not meant to be posted! It was sent accidentally! 73, Jon KE9NA -- The Second Amendment is NOT about duck hunting! Jon Ogden jono@enteract.com www.qsl.net/ke9na "A life lived; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00298.html (9,927 bytes)
12. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 13:35:53 -0700; ? indeed ? When the maximum voltage on the slotted line equals the minimum voltage on the slotted line, the VSWR is 1:1. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.co; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00310.html (10,139 bytes)
13. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 13:35:54 -0700; ? You might do well to try the experiment, Jon. Who knows, you could be right? Wanna make a side bet of a large pizza with five toppings and salad bar?. ? I am aware of no textbook that says moving; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00311.html (10,035 bytes)
14. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 16:52:48 -0400; On Friday, October 08, 1999 4:36 PM, measures [SMTP:measures@vcnet.com] wrote: The SWR Are we sliding a SWR meter or a voltmeter along the slotted line? Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00314.html (9,429 bytes)
15. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 15:38:56 -0700; ? volt - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Pr; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00317.html (9,307 bytes)
16. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1): Author: realex@flash.net (bob alexander); Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 20:23:34 -0500; Rich, There are several possible reasons why your measurements "varied all over the place." 1. You have a defective SWR meter 2. You have a balanced load at the end of an unbalanced coax resulting in; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00322.html (10,012 bytes)
17. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Sat, 9 Oct 1999 09:05:35 +0100; --Original Message-- From: measures <measures@vcnet.com> To: Gilmer, Mike <mgilmer@gnlp.com>; 'AMPS' <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 08 October 1999 23:41 Subject: RE: [AMPS] Ho; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00323.html (10,120 bytes)
18. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Sat, 9 Oct 1999 07:32:45 -0700; A halfwave of 93 ohm coax was connected to a 50 ohm termination. The 50-ohm swr meter) was inserted at the end of the 93 ohm section and the reading was 1:1. At the center of the halfwave section, t; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00325.html (10,918 bytes)
19. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Sat, 9 Oct 1999 07:32:49 -0700; To: <amps@contesting.com> OK One must measure the min (null) and the max. v on the slotted line. Arghh later, Steve - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contest; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00327.html (10,449 bytes)
20. [AMPS] Hold on - SWR meter placement (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 22:01:50 +0100; "varied all termination. The section and the the swr was have a matched is inserted. matters. If you used a SWR meter set up to work with Zo of 93ohms, the reading would not change with position. If; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00352.html (9,491 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]