Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Fw\:\s+censorship\,\s+bad\s+news\s+time\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Fw: censorship, bad news time (score: 1)
Author: nospam4me@juno.com (nospam4me@juno.com)
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 17:01:41 -0700
Hello to the gang which also includes Rich. If Rich is kept off the list, I'll soon be un subscribing myself. I don't care to read a lot of the politics, but I don't want anyone kicked off because pe
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00791.html (9,179 bytes)

2. [AMPS] Fw: censorship, bad news time (score: 1)
Author: k6ndv@contesting.com (Will)
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 17:15:47 -0700
Well time to clarify something. NOBODY has been deleted from the AMPS reflector!! Rich is still on the list and he has been on it with the same address for months. I don't know who started the rumor
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00792.html (10,345 bytes)

3. [AMPS] Fw: censorship, bad news time (score: 1)
Author: baycock@HIWAAY.NET (Bill Aycock)
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 20:10:20 -0500
The word about Rich being kicked off was started by ** Rich Measures ** himself, in posts to a big list of people that was really just the amps list addresses he had collected. He acted as though he
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00795.html (12,209 bytes)

4. [AMPS] Fw: censorship, bad news time (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 23:10:31 -0700
To receive the list of members, send "who amps" in the body. Majordomo will send back the current mailing list. For those who run the Mac OS, Claris Emailer will auto-convert up to 1000 addresses in
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00799.html (11,157 bytes)

5. [AMPS] Fw: censorship, bad news time (score: 1)
Author: dhb@mediaone.net (Dave, AA6YQ)
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 02:54:23 -0400
Lets review an important principle of logic: 1. suppose that conditions A, B, and C all imply condition D example: - getting booted from the mailing list implies that one's posts will not be remaile
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00801.html (8,741 bytes)

6. [AMPS] Fw: censorship, bad news time (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 01:46:03 -0700
Implication? Experience has shown that this is the case. The e-mail did not bounce. It was received and autodeleted by Majordomo. Other posts were being remailed. Mine were not. I posted the letter
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00802.html (9,414 bytes)

7. [AMPS] Fw: censorship, bad news time (score: 1)
Author: rfamps@ic24.net (Steve Thompson)
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 07:24:32 +0100
If the list contains all members, one could look for oneself as a check. Steve -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00812.html (8,098 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu