Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Freeband\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Freeband\?\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Freeband?? (score: 1): Author: jtml@lanl.gov (John T. M. Lyles); Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 09:36:16 -0600; This summer I listened to 27-29 MHz a bit, for DX, and noted that the Freeband concept is alive and splattering. What is really astounding to me is how horrible the audio and the RF quality of many o; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00577.html (6,987 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Freeband?? (score: 1): Author: rakefet@rakefet.com (Vic Rosenthal); Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 08:41:35 -0700; I was looking at some of the CB amp websites, and in one case the manufaturer bragged that his amps were very efficient, because...they operate CLASS C!! I guess they'd probably work fine for CW, tho; /archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00578.html (7,144 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]