Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+FCC\s+Part\s+97\.317\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+FCC\s+Part\s+97\.317\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] FCC Part 97.317 (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 13 Sep 2000 08:39:50 -0700; Part 97.317 says... << (c) Certification may be denied when denial would prevent the use of these amplifiers in services other than the amateur service. The following features will result in dismissa; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00607.html (8,467 bytes)
2. [AMPS] FCC Part 97.317 (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 09:11:07 -0700; Given the choice, CBers often prefer to buy ham type radios. end - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.c; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00612.html (8,613 bytes)
3. [AMPS] FCC Part 97.317 (score: 1): Author: w2fca@qsl.net (w2fca@qsl.net); Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 09:22:09 -0700; Seems to me that preventing CB use is the ONLY reason the requirements are there. Frank W2FCA -- Sent using MailStart.com ( http://MailStart.Com/welcome.html ) The FREE way to access your mailbox vi; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00615.html (7,728 bytes)
4. [AMPS] FCC Part 97.317 (score: 1): Author: wc6w@juno.com (Radio WC6W); Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 12:21:54 EDT; On 13 Sep 2000 08:39:50 -0700 Mike Gilmer - N2MG <n2mg@contesting.com> writes: (snip) Hi Mike, YES, that is exactly what that part is all about. Take a look at subsection 97.317 c 8 (Oct. 1995 editio; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00616.html (8,956 bytes)
5. [AMPS] FCC Part 97.317 (score: 1): Author: alsopb@gloryroad.net (alsopb); Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 16:26:32 +0000; Your conclusion is based upon assuming the algorithms used. Given that they are pure fiction for the exposure impact, I have another explanation for the "predicted" safety of standing next to a 50 kw; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00617.html (9,687 bytes)
6. [AMPS] FCC Part 97.317 (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 13 Sep 2000 09:48:41 -0700; I'm missing something here... :) ________________________________________________ PeoplePC: It's for people. And it's just smart. http://www.peoplepc.com -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00619.html (10,683 bytes)
7. [AMPS] FCC Part 97.317 (score: 1): Author: w4pj@bellsouth.net (Scott Hotchkiss); Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 14:07:37 -0400; What does Icom use with the 706? Is there an internal T/R switch? Or an external (RF sensing) interface? Or does this NOT pertain to exciters and only amplifiers and their manufacturers? de W4PJ Scot; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00623.html (9,562 bytes)
8. [AMPS] FCC Part 97.317 (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 13 Sep 2000 11:22:03 -0700; This section of Part97 is for amplifiers only. Go to ARRL's web site http://www.arrl.org/field/regulations/news/part97/ §97.317 Standards for certification of external RF power amplifiers. _____; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00624.html (10,514 bytes)
9. [AMPS] FCC Part 97.317 (score: 1): Author: stutz-jim@netdot.com (Jim Stutzman); Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 21:24:28 -0500; It seems like a good reason to me, what does a CBer need with an amp? It also occurs to me that there was, once upon a time, a Part 95 that spelled out the fact that the CB spectrum excluded amps ...; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00675.html (8,908 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]