- 1. [AMPS] Dead Horse (not yet) (score: 1)
- Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike)
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 10:47:36 -0400
- ago, transmission Guy two responds: One guy talks about the VSWR being the same along the slotted line. The other guy, in apparent disagreement, says the VOLTAGE varies with position. And there's a P
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00401.html (7,528 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] Dead Horse (not yet) (score: 1)
- Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 99 10:02:06 -0500
- Yes it is obfuscation! And it even caught me and I noticed it. Unfortunately, I accidentally sent out a post criticizing guy two's position (it was written before I caught my error, but was accidenta
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00404.html (8,509 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] Dead Horse (not yet) (score: 1)
- Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike)
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 11:35:40 -0400
- Not sure I understand, Jon. If we're looking at a standing wave, by definition the voltage at a specific point on the line never changes. We slide the detector probe along the line until we find a pe
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00406.html (7,574 bytes)
- 4. [AMPS] Dead Horse (not yet) (score: 1)
- Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 99 10:55:47 -0500
- OK, I see what you are saying. The voltage ALONG the line IS constantly changing. The signal is in the form of a sinusoid. However, for a specific point on the line, the voltage does not change, henc
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00407.html (7,958 bytes)
- 5. [AMPS] Dead Horse (not yet) (score: 1)
- Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike)
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 12:16:11 -0400
- Yup, more misinformation. Should be 1/4-wave from the peak to the minimum (1/2-wave between peaks). Mea culpa. Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contes
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00409.html (7,243 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu