- 1. [AMPS] Conversation Continuity (score: 1)
- Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL)
- Date: Sat, 13 Dec 1997 14:14:11 -0600
- Am I the only one who has difficulty following WHO said WHAT in some of these never-ending debates? How about preceding YOUR remarks with YOUR CALL, sort of like reading a play where each line is pre
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00274.html (7,099 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] Conversation Continuity (score: 1)
- Author: wa2moe@doitnow.com (Stu Greene)
- Date: Sat, 13 Dec 1997 12:36:52 -0700
- Tom...you aren't the only one. Many of us are the victims of conversational oscillation -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests:
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00275.html (7,195 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] Conversation Continuity (score: 1)
- Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
- Date: Sat, 13 Dec 97 12:53:55 -0800
- You should see the quoted text of each writer in a different colour, with a different number of greater-than characters (>) preceeding each quoted line. If an e-mail app. does not do this, it sucks.
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00276.html (7,399 bytes)
- 4. [AMPS] Conversation Continuity (score: 1)
- Author: wrt@eskimo.com (Bill Turner)
- Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 04:27:04 GMT
- On Sat, 13 Dec 97 12:53:55 -0800, Rich Measures <measures@vc.net> wrote: _______________________________________________________________ Agent by Forte does this perfectly. It even gives you your cho
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-12/msg00281.html (7,755 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu