Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Commercial\s+amp\s+design\s+on\s+AMPS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Commercial\s+amp\s+design\s+on\s+AMPS\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Commercial amp design on AMPS (score: 1): Author: w8nf@mailroom.com (w8nf@mailroom.com); Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 19:18:14 GMT; Sometimes I'm surprised at what people complain about. Is W8JI soliciting inputs on how to design a commercial amplifier? Maybe. Only he knows the answer as a certainty. For the 25+ years I've been a; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00395.html (8,779 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Commercial amp design on AMPS (score: 1): Author: kd4wov@earthlink.net (Tom Tishken KD4WOV(laptop)); Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:21:02 -0400; I agree many manufactures design what THEY see as a money making opportunity, not what does the market want. If manufactures would do a little research it would make things a lot better. I also want; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00396.html (10,346 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Commercial amp design on AMPS (score: 1): Author: kc5ajx@hotmail.com (Rick Bullon); Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 19:27:19 GMT; Hey Dave I agree with you. I wished more manufacturers and or designers would participate in forms like this. But the reason they don't is the personal attacks like Tom puts up with and the general B; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00397.html (10,738 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Commercial amp design on AMPS (score: 1): Author: HAMKE4WY@aol.com (HAMKE4WY@aol.com); Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 16:20:37 EDT; Exactly, and the person asking a simple question never gets an answer. 73 de KE4WY Jim that original -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00398.html (9,098 bytes)
5. [AMPS] Commercial amp design on AMPS (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:33:16 -0700; Not using a VHF parasitic suppressor on an 8877 in HF service is unsliced bologna. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions:; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00399.html (11,045 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Commercial amp design on AMPS (score: 1): Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com); Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 17:52:54 EDT; that original -- Personally I don't give a hang whether Tom uses the Amps reflector to HELP him design amplifiers or not. What I have a problem with is the high handed manner with which we are told t; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00402.html (10,704 bytes)
7. [AMPS] Commercial amp design on AMPS (score: 1): Author: ka4u@vnet.net (John Simmons); Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 18:32:47 -0400; Don't dare ask a question that requires any technical thought or you will get ignored because all the so call EXPERTS here are to busy sniping at each other to be bother with anythin of technical imp; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00404.html (8,294 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Commercial amp design on AMPS (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 18:40:02 -0400; Hi Dave, If I've said something to personally insult you I'm sorry and apologize here in public. I only was trying to point out the claim the filament choke and plate choke somehow affected efficienc; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00405.html (9,220 bytes)
9. [AMPS] Commercial amp design on AMPS (score: 1): Author: w7ti@jps.net (Bill Turner); Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 16:09:23 -0700; ______________________________________________________________ Really? The only thing I get tired of is posts like the above. I learn a lot here, but then I have an active and well-tuned BS filter. O; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00409.html (8,390 bytes)
10. [AMPS] Commercial amp design on AMPS (score: 1): Author: k7fm@teleport.com (Lamb); Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 18:27:06 -0700; "It was said that: Don't dare ask a question that requires any technical thought or you will get ignored because all the so call EXPERTS here are to busy sniping at each other to be bother with anyth; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00417.html (9,229 bytes)
11. [AMPS] Commercial amp design on AMPS (score: 1): Author: ITR@Nanoteq.co.za (Ian Roberts); Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 09:55:22 +0200; Tom, a fellow just sent me a private e-mail accusing me of "as usual" supporting someone else on this reflector. My advice to him was to remember that at the end of the day, it's pure ham. Unfortunat; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00425.html (8,687 bytes)
12. [AMPS] Commercial amp design on AMPS (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:20:46 -0400; The problem is more that some simple question have no simple answers. They would require a book or an entire article to be written. Take for example the sweep tube question. I think the question was; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00439.html (9,247 bytes)
13. [AMPS] Commercial amp design on AMPS (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 13:27:46 +0100; Nor can they offer too much meaningful advice on amplifiers! OK, I realise some people make that complaint about this list, too. 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submi; /archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00440.html (8,029 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]