- 1. [AMPS] COAX (score: 1)
- Author: w2ge@home.com (Phil Levin W2GE)
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 10:56:06 -0400
- Jon, regarding what coax they use... This is the answer I received (and perhaps so have you?) Phil, W2GE "And as for the question about what type of coax we use... Andrews is the name of the game. 5
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00448.html (7,410 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] COAX (score: 1)
- Author: sheepdip@continet.com (Larry L. Ravlin)
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 08:02:29 -0700
- Never again am I going to worry about running my little four, 3-500zg amp a little over the limit. Larry -- To: <amps@contesting.com> -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00449.html (8,553 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] COAX (score: 1)
- Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike)
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 11:08:52 -0400
- amp a At least while you're mobile ;) Mike N2MG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: o
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00450.html (7,141 bytes)
- 4. [AMPS] COAX (score: 1)
- Author: mike@g0mjw.freeserve.co.uk (G0MJW)
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 17:00:28 +0100
- Something tells me there is some exaggeration going on here. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.c
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00452.html (7,400 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu