Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Anyone\s+ready\s+to\s+go\s+back\s+to\s+talking\s+about\s+CBers\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Anyone\s+ready\s+to\s+go\s+back\s+to\s+talking\s+about\s+CBers\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Anyone ready to go back to talking about CBers? (score: 1): Author: da_kang@hotmail.com (Jeff Wolf); Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 16:20:29 GMT; In light of all the technical discussions, running around in circles and mud-slinging, would anyone care to go back to arguing about how terrible CBers are, manufacturers that sell easily modified am; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00295.html (7,748 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Anyone ready to go back to talking about CBers? (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 17:29:50 +0100; lately..- Your definition of 'technical' may be different to mine. 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQU; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00298.html (7,179 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Anyone ready to go back to talking about CBers? (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 09:59:13 -0700; Ok. It is in RTF. Word will open it. The file is 2.4MB. It contains around one million words. The interesting stuff begins just after Mr. Rauch mysteriously cancelled a post on 28 November. In this; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00303.html (7,901 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]