- 1. [AMPS] ARRL and QST(and CW Relevance) (score: 1)
- Author: leewical@lava.net (LEE ROGER WICAL)
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 08:57:00 -0500
- Serious AMPers: Although all this subject matter of the ARRL is good, but does it really have to be on the AMPS reflector? I don't think so. So, why not address comments direct to K1zz@arrl.org and i
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00543.html (10,355 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] ARRL and QST(and CW Relevance) (score: 1)
- Author: johnf@futurenet.co.za (John Fielding)
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 21:29:14 +0200
- Whereas I appreciate your concern about the subject being "off-beam" I believe myself and I suspect a lot of others like to "chew the fat" from time to time and take a very dim view of someone tellin
- /archives//html/Amps/1999-01/msg00544.html (9,663 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu