Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+ALC\s+considerations\s+with\s+SB\-200\s+and\s+TS\-430S\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+ALC\s+considerations\s+with\s+SB\-200\s+and\s+TS\-430S\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] ALC considerations with SB-200 and TS-430S (score: 1): Author: ke3ok@netins.net (KE3OK); Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 17:23:02 -0600; Hi Gang, I just received my spiffy _new_ SB-200 amplifier today. I'm using a TS-430S as an exciter. The 430 requires -8 to-10 VDC for ALC. After searching through the Heathkit manual I can't find any; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00350.html (7,451 bytes)
2. [AMPS] ALC considerations with SB-200 and TS-430S (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 19 Mar 98 16:08:41 -0800; 100w is enough drive for 4, 572Bs. However, ALC does not work as imagined due to finite onset delay. Better to put 20 to 30 ohms in series with the SB-200's RF coupling capacitor to the cathodes. Th; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00352.html (7,906 bytes)
3. [AMPS] ALC considerations with SB-200 and TS-430S (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 10:26:27 EST; I would not even bother using the ALC Al. Instead do some testing and find out where you start running into gain compression. With the TS-430's very touchy requirements for low VSWR it may not be the; /archives//html/Amps/1998-03/msg00354.html (9,842 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]