- 1. [AMPS] 8877s (score: 1)
- Author: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net)
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 1997 09:38:11 +0000
- To: <amps@contesting.com> Marv, I tried e-mailing this to you, but it bounced. 73, Tom W8JI -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative reque
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00001.html (7,986 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] 8877s (score: 1)
- Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 97 10:07:04 -0700
- To: <amps@contesting.com> Mr. Rauch: Was the information from Eimac written or verbal? thanks Rich-- R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissio
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-07/msg00003.html (7,779 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] 8877s (score: 1)
- Author: w6frmarv@juno.com (marv h. gonsior)
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 18:34:32 EDT
- Hello all. A number of postings have made reference to a certain time span wherein Eimac was having processing problems with their 8877. IF this is true, would someone kindly let me know what info th
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-06/msg00375.html (6,195 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu