Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+8877\s+rectifier\s+board\s+considerations\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] 8877 rectifier board considerations (score: 1)
Author: N7CXI@SiliconPixels.com (Jim Barber)
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 09:25:08 -0800
Hi folks, I'm at the point where I'm laying out the B+ rectifier board for my 8877 project, and it occurs to me I don't know much about component spacing for high-voltage (2800 VRMS, 3900VDC typical)
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00311.html (8,581 bytes)

2. [AMPS] 8877 rectifier board considerations (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 07:56:41 -0800
It appears as though no one answered you, at least not on the reflector. I'd question the sanity of homebrewing rectifier boards when K2AW's modules are so cheap, are well insulated, and work great.
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00328.html (10,101 bytes)

3. [AMPS] 8877 rectifier board considerations (score: 1)
Author: shr@ricc.net (Signal Hill Ranch)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 09:27:10 -0700
Jim-- Take a look at the boards on Paul's site. Think it might save you a lot of time. http://wd7s.home.att.net/triode_control.htm Good Luck--John W0UN John W. Brosnahan shr@ricc.net -- FAQ on WWW: h
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00329.html (10,251 bytes)

4. [AMPS] 8877 rectifier board considerations (score: 1)
Author: N7CXI@SiliconPixels.com (Jim Barber)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 09:35:11 -0800
Steve, John, and others that replied off the reflector: Thanks for the replies. I agree that it's much easier to buy pre-built modules, certainly cheaper when you consider the cost of having prototyp
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00336.html (8,761 bytes)

5. [AMPS] 8877 rectifier board considerations (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 10:20:20 -0800
Hi Jim, I surely wouldn't bother with the setup costs of prototyping PC boards for an array of diodes...the off-the-shelf prototype boards in all the electronics hobby stores will do the job just fin
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00338.html (10,583 bytes)

6. [AMPS] 8877 rectifier board considerations (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:27:44 -0800
Hi Jim, K2AW Silicon Alley telephone (516) 334-7024. "Same day shipping." 8kV, 250A surge modules = $10.00/each. They're not large, I cannot imagine a "board" version being any smaller. 73, Jim! Stev
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00343.html (9,368 bytes)

7. [AMPS] 8877 rectifier board considerations (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 12:02:17 -0800
Hi Paul, There's no 6A equivalent part to the JTX1N5554. Problem is, JAN parts must be hermetically sealed by spec, and to make a 6A glass or ceramic dual-plug, metalurgically-bonded part is nearly i
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00344.html (12,071 bytes)

8. [AMPS] 8877 rectifier board considerations (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:23:03 -0800
// We sell 1n5408, 1000piv, 200A peak, 3A avg. diodes for 17-cents each or $14.40 per hundred. . . When mounted on perfboard, the junctions run cooler than epoxy-potted diode-blocks because cooling
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00345.html (9,875 bytes)

9. [AMPS] 8877 rectifier board considerations (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:23:04 -0800
A perfboard version is not smaller but it runs at lower junction temps. A board version of 8kV/3A costs $1.36 plus the cost of the perfboard. - R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measu
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00346.html (9,041 bytes)

10. [AMPS] 8877 rectifier board considerations (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:23:06 -0800
Add a heatsink, and the perfboard version takes up less volume. - R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@c
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00347.html (10,127 bytes)

11. [AMPS] 8877 rectifier board considerations (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:33:23 -0800
-- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00348.html (11,030 bytes)

12. [AMPS] 8877 rectifier board considerations (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:56:02 -0800
So what is the avg current rating of the same 1n5408/3A diodes when they are potted by K2AW? I have used potted diodes and - with the requisite heatsink - they were larger than the low-tech perfboar
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00349.html (10,918 bytes)

13. [AMPS] 8877 rectifier board considerations (score: 1)
Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 15:06:35 -0800
Hi Rich, The K2AW modules are rated 1.0A at 55 degrees C, derating to zero at 150 degrees C. Thus, a bridge made of four such modules would have a 2.0A/55 deg C rating, attached to any surface having
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00351.html (12,794 bytes)

14. [AMPS] 8877 rectifier board considerations (score: 1)
Author: N7CXI@SiliconPixels.com (Jim Barber)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 15:26:26 -0800
Since this beastie will only see an ampere on the rare and unintended peak, I suspect that either diode strings or modules will last a long time, unless It Happens. There's a 50-ohm, 100-watt resisto
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00353.html (9,390 bytes)

15. [AMPS] 8877 rectifier board considerations (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 18:03:18 -0800
/ There is no such statement on the tech spec sheets. If a seal is leaky, the tube is history. cheers, Jim - R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00364.html (9,450 bytes)

16. [AMPS] 8877 rectifier board considerations (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 18:03:21 -0800
\ I mount the rectifiers G-10 perfboard supported by an aluminum bracket in the inlet air-stream. It works, takes less space and 11kV @ 3A costs around $5 for a FWD. \ Yea, verily. I used to have an
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00365.html (9,698 bytes)

17. [AMPS] 8877 rectifier board considerations (score: 1)
Author: N7CXI@SiliconPixels.com (Jim Barber)
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 04:07:19 -0800
And Rich answered: Ah. Then the tales of heating the tubes for a period after extended storage are just that. I have no reason to believe any seal is leaky, but I had heard that the potential for a s
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00369.html (9,155 bytes)

18. [AMPS] 8877 rectifier board considerations (score: 1)
Author: 2@vc.net (2)
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 07:07:40 -0800
// On the surface it sounds like a helpful tip. With some multi-hundreds of kWs, 22kV electron-tubes that have been in storage, it may be a good idea to run the ion-pump for a while before blastoff.
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00370.html (10,156 bytes)

19. [AMPS] 8877 rectifier board considerations (score: 1)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 15:39:05 +0000
No, they're not just tales. There are two ways gas can get into a vacuum tube. One is through a faulty seal, as Rich said. But even if a tube has perfect seals, the inside surfaces of the tube can ve
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00376.html (11,314 bytes)

20. [AMPS] 8877 rectifier board considerations (score: 1)
Author: N7CXI@SiliconPixels.com (Jim Barber)
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 08:48:28 -0800
Ian, Ok, that makes sense. I suppose an inverted way of looking at it is that if the tube -didn't- emit any gas internally, there would be no need for a getter. One of the reasons I asked was based o
/archives//html/Amps/2001-11/msg00381.html (9,962 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu