- 1. [AMPS] 87a/89 v. 2500e (score: 1)
- Author: mlevine@compsol.net (Mark Levine, D.C.)
- Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1998 17:03:29 -0500
- This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --2261F6495D7E10AEDFB470CA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello all. I am contemplating the purchase of a new
- /archives//html/Amps/1998-12/msg00119.html (7,950 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] 87a/89 v. 2500e (score: 1)
- Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid)
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 13:45:05 -1000
- With around 13 dB gain, your 100 or so watt barefoot transceiver will get the legal 1500 watts out from the 8K. And the tube in the 8K will be cool, calm, and last you the rest of your life time!! E
- /archives//html/Amps/1998-12/msg00120.html (7,767 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] 87a/89 v. 2500e (score: 1)
- Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 22:29:02 -0800
- However, the tank of the Henry 8k is designed for a much lower RL -- i.e., the tank is designed for 2.5a of anode current. In order to produce this much anode current, c. 400w of drive is needed. -
- /archives//html/Amps/1998-12/msg00122.html (8,065 bytes)
- 4. [AMPS] 87a/89 v. 2500e (score: 1)
- Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
- Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 09:56:02 -0500
- The output power of a LK-800A ( three 3CX800's) and the LK780 ( two tubes) with 70-80W of drive varied only a few hundred watts. Outputs on 20M 2300W and 2100W respectively. The tube is rated by Eima
- /archives//html/Amps/1998-12/msg00138.html (8,921 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu