- 1. [AMPS] 3cx3000a7 versus 4cx15000 (score: 1)
- Author: irosky@yahoo.com (igor rosky)
- Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1998 21:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
- I read comments on the 3cx3000, i think it is a very good tube for the price, the reasoning behind my arguments is this a station runs an 8281 @ 20 kw he has the money! I am a dreaming little pistol
- /archives//html/Amps/1998-09/msg00285.html (8,942 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] 3cx3000a7 versus 4cx15000 (score: 1)
- Author: davidc@bit-net.com (DavidC)
- Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 00:20:48 -0400
- These power levels are not legal on Amateur Bands in the US, are they in your country? -- Thank You! & 73, DavidC AA1FA -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesti
- /archives//html/Amps/1998-09/msg00286.html (9,847 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] 3cx3000a7 versus 4cx15000 (score: 1)
- Author: aa7bg@3rivers.net (Matt--K7BG)
- Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1998 23:33:27 -0600
- I believe Bill Clinton is the only one running this much power stateside. 73, Matt--K7BG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests
- /archives//html/Amps/1998-09/msg00287.html (8,038 bytes)
- 4. [AMPS] 3cx3000a7 versus 4cx15000 (score: 1)
- Author: zeitler@ibm.net (zeitler@ibm.net)
- Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 06:29:54 -0700
- Igor, I have always felt that if the station I am calling can't be worked with at least a solid kilowatt and a yagi then it was not meant to be worked by me. Remember: this is AMATEUR radio. It is me
- /archives//html/Amps/1998-09/msg00295.html (11,212 bytes)
- 5. [AMPS] 3cx3000a7 versus 4cx15000 (score: 1)
- Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
- Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 14:29:53 -0400
- On Sat, 26 Sep 1998 21:13:28 -0700 (PDT) igor rosky <irosky@yahoo.com> writes: Take a look at the YC-156 which is basically a 3CX5000A7 with the 3CX15000 grid and cathode. Very popular in medical ele
- /archives//html/Amps/1998-09/msg00298.html (8,052 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu