Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+30\-S1\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+30\-S1\s+Question\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] 30-S1 Question (score: 1): Author: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se); Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 09:25:32 +0200; I have a weak memory that people used to put another tube instead of the 4CX1000 in the 30-S1, can someone refresh my memory. How much power can then a 30-S1 put out, original and/or modified. 73 Jim; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00094.html (6,992 bytes)
2. [AMPS] 30-S1 Question (score: 1): Author: 2@vc.net (measures); Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 01:19:13 -0700; 4CX1500B. The screen potential rating is exceeded by the popular mod. Pout is reportedly around 2kW pep. cheers, Jim - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.co; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00095.html (6,993 bytes)
3. [AMPS] 30-S1 Question (score: 1): Author: bipi@att.net (Leigh); Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 06:03:04 -0700; 4CX1500B...has a little more screen and grid dissipation capability. Stock, they put out about 1000-1200 watts. If the screen voltage is increased to 325V, they put out 1500 watts no problemo. This; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00096.html (7,308 bytes)
4. [AMPS] 30-S1 Question (score: 1): Author: k7fm@teleport.com (Lamb); Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 00:46:15 -0700; Perhaps the best reason for changing the final tube in the 30S-1 is that the 4CX1500 is specially designed for linear amplifiers and therefore has a much cleaner output than the 4CX1000. It is rare t; /archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00141.html (7,267 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]