- 1. [AMPS] 3-500Z vs 3-500ZG (score: 1)
- Author: w5hvv@aeneas.net (Rod Fitz-Randolph)
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 20:50:03 -0500
- Not sure about the 3-500ZG designation but I am referring to the graphite plate 3-500s. My friend, WA4VWR, needs to replace a 3-500Z in his SB-220. He doesn't believe he should just replace one singl
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00235.html (7,496 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] 3-500Z vs 3-500ZG (score: 1)
- Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 97 03:29:29 -0800
- True - - so buy one Eimac - they are currently made by Triton/GE. the same. He would get the same rf output if he replaced the 3-500Zs with 3-400Zs because the peak emission is identical. Eimac 3-50
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00237.html (8,406 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] 3-500Z vs 3-500ZG (score: 1)
- Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 11:04:05 EDT
- On Wed, 10 Sep 1997 20:50:03 -0500 w5hvv@aeneas.net (Rod Fitz-Randolph) writes: It is usually not a good idea to mix different types/brands of tubes. It CAN be done but the potential for problems are
- /archives//html/Amps/1997-09/msg00242.html (8,879 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu