Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+2\s+TONE\s+TESTS\s+OF\s+G2DAF\s+CIRCUIT\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+2\s+TONE\s+TESTS\s+OF\s+G2DAF\s+CIRCUIT\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] 2 TONE TESTS OF G2DAF CIRCUIT (score: 1): Author: k7fm@teleport.com (Lamb); Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 15:59:11 -0800; Question: If the G2DAF circuit distorts because it draws too much grid current, then how could it a 2 tone test? Assuming it passes two tone testing, that would mean that even if the G2DAF draws subs; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00349.html (7,514 bytes)
2. [AMPS] 2 TONE TESTS OF G2DAF CIRCUIT (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 08:14:12 +0000; "Too much grid current" seems to be a minor (or minority) aspect of the doubts about the G2DAF. The major doubt is the varying screen voltage, leading to gain that varies with drive level. It would b; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00358.html (9,222 bytes)
3. [AMPS] 2 TONE TESTS OF G2DAF CIRCUIT (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 15:52:51 -0700; ? good point, Ian. Therein lies the sticky wicket. Hows about using a 100F screen bypass C in the DAF amp? Whistle it up and talk for ten minutes. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. --; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00371.html (10,275 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]