Mail Archive Search: <+from:w6ru@lightspeed.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:w6ru@lightspeed.net: 70 ]

Total 70 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Re: Poor science (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser - W6RU); Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 09:14:50 -0800; snip I really question why I am wasting my time with this ... I hope this will be of interst to some ... I am sure Mr. Denial will will just consider it nonsence as he has with most all of Rich's cla; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00165.html (11,496 bytes)
2. [AMPS] Re: Poor Science (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser - W6RU); Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 20:48:06 -0800; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0042_01BF86E4.1B9B6EE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tom....... LOL will the; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00204.html (20,513 bytes)
3. [AMPS] Re: Poor Science (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser - W6RU); Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 20:52:00 -0800; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_004B_01BF86E4.A71993C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Joe's comments... chang; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00207.html (11,781 bytes)
4. [AMPS] Re: Poor Science (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser - W6RU); Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 20:57:47 -0800; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0054_01BF86E5.76448CE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mike wrote ... @ I seem; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00208.html (10,817 bytes)
5. [AMPS] RE: Poor Science (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser - W6RU); Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 02:07:14 -0800; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_000E_01BF8710.B0BF0B40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Joe, The amplifier WAS; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00217.html (16,790 bytes)
6. [AMPS] Re: Poor Science (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser - W6RU); Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 11:22:35 -0800; TOM .... Go back and re-read please. It was stated the HV interlock was disabled ! . There was no short ! Type and brand are two different things to me ... the brand was Eimac. No it doesn't ... the; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00257.html (10,700 bytes)
7. [AMPS] RE: Poor Science (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser - W6RU); Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 11:26:30 -0800; I quit opening the top cover with the amplifier turned on. The amplifier worked great other than when you wanted open it up. <g> Terry W6RU -- Original Message -- From: Michael Tope <W4EF@pacbell.net; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00258.html (11,854 bytes)
8. [AMPS] Re: Poor Science (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser - W6RU); Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 11:51:22 -0800; Phil, This was about 4 years ago ... I don't remember what the voltage was or if I measured it. This was an amp I had for a ~short~ time. Terry W6RU not to the -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.co; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00264.html (9,958 bytes)
9. [AMPS] Re: Poor Science (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser - W6RU); Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 12:41:51 -0800; Amen. Tom is trying to ignore my comments about G. W. Fyler's article on parasitic osc. in the 1935 Journal of the Institute of Radio Engineers. Tom seemingly doesn't want to discuss his post of 28 N; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00287.html (9,126 bytes)
10. [AMPS] Re: Poor Science (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser - W6RU); Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 18:23:13 -0800; Yes, it had a HV crowbar type interlock that would take the B+ to chassis ground. Before opening the top cover with high voltage applied I went into the RF deck with the amplifier disconnected from p; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00304.html (9,725 bytes)
11. [AMPS] Re: Poor science (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser - W6RU); Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 18:46:34 -0800; ON ! I of grunt to Jon .... look at what you just said .... quote "But having them keyed and moving ...." Now look at the first line of my description of what happened .... "The amplifier was in STAN; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00307.html (10,893 bytes)
12. [AMPS] Re: Poor science (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser - W6RU); Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 19:17:18 -0800; You would think not ..... Sure surprised the heck out of me. Don't know other than the plate ampmeter showed no idling current when the amp was not keyed. Terry W6RU -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contest; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00309.html (9,923 bytes)
13. [AMPS] Re: Poor science (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser - W6RU); Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 21:50:41 -0800; the grid. this. down miles I understand your thinking Phil .... but what caused it ... twice ? Terry W6RU -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Admini; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00331.html (9,729 bytes)
14. [AMPS] Re: Poor science (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser - W6RU); Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 15:04:30 -0800; I agree Ian .... So wouldn't that lead one to think maybe a VHF/UHF oscillation might have taken place ? An oscillation of some magnitude some say can't happen ??? Terry W6RU -- FAQ on WWW: http://ww; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00410.html (9,650 bytes)
15. [AMPS] Re: Poor science (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser - W6RU); Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 17:57:54 -0800; some Tom, I understand where you are coming from here. But the fact remains it happened not only once but twice ... just as I stated. I like to keep an open mind ... I will listen to all for their su; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00419.html (11,510 bytes)
16. [AMPS] Re: Poor science (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser - W6RU); Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 09:17:11 -0800; I haven't posted my very strange case of oscillation (or whatever) before now cause I felt it would be very difficult if not impossible to determine what actually happened. I finally brought it forwa; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00471.html (10,158 bytes)
17. [AMPS] Re: Poor science (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser - W6RU); Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 11:53:53 -0800; Long gone Rich .... History ! Terry W6RU -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-am; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00482.html (7,857 bytes)
18. [AMPS] Chokes (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser - W6RU); Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 16:22:02 -0800; I agree with Phil on this choke ... as he stated. It has worked very well for me on a couple projects. Terry W6RU over -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesti; /archives//html/Amps/2000-03/msg00610.html (10,906 bytes)
19. [AMPS] Adios (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser - W6RU); Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 16:56:40 -0800; Glad I am fortunate enough that my computer has a "Delete" button ... or I might get frustrated at times also <g>. Terry W6RU QRO 4 EVA -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissio; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00160.html (7,097 bytes)
20. [AMPS] Simmer Down Now! (score: 1): Author: w6ru@lightspeed.net (Terry Gaiser - W6RU); Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 19:44:43 -0800; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0063_01BF7A48.9A805980 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Steve ... I can't be; /archives//html/Amps/2000-02/msg00335.html (11,366 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]