Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:stevewrightnz@gmail.com: 150 ]

Total 150 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 148, Issue 35 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 07:30:48 +1200
Very cool! Your software? Steve _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2015-04/msg00178.html (6,894 bytes)

22. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 07:23:46 +1200
Not meaning to quote anyone in particular here, but what is this insecure fixation with watt meters? Do we want to not break the rules by ten watts? No, I do not care about ten watts over the limit,
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00023.html (8,242 bytes)

23. [Amps] sweatin' the small stuff was: Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 14:04:50 +1200
I'm not being personal here - I'm mocking OURSELVES because we worry too much about stuff that aint mean nuthin. Internet wars erupt of this sort of thing and go on for years! No. One. Gives. A. Saus
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00037.html (8,070 bytes)

24. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 07:41:58 +1200
The same people run lots of processor and ALC breaching its meter scale. We don't spend much time talking with them, and if they join our group we give them the arse real quick. It's some work to be
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00060.html (9,576 bytes)

25. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 10:23:47 +1200
Sorry to be blunt, but it's not worth anything. Aint no way the regulatory authority inspector can park his vehicle out on the roadside and make up some story that he can read your transmit power wit
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00063.html (8,567 bytes)

26. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 149, Issue 10 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 11:01:08 +1200
FCC in your shack? Did they have a signed court order? The only way anyone comes into my shack, is a mate for a coffee/tea/beer/dinner. Anyone else brings documents with a signature from a magistrate
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00064.html (10,252 bytes)

27. Re: [Amps] HV transformer and Variac (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 07:00:20 +1200
Usually the transformer is the difficult part. You can simply purchase some tube, so build the easy part around the difficult part. Buy that big tube. ;) Steve _______________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2015-07/msg00078.html (7,360 bytes)

28. Re: [Amps] SMPS Question (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:00:08 +1200
You easily turn them off during RX - not what you would normally do with a Linear HT supply. I too would like to see an "easy" switching HT supply, of around 2-4 KVA. S ______________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2015-07/msg00082.html (7,267 bytes)

29. Re: [Amps] IMD and spurious measurements (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2015 14:47:32 +1200
On 09/08/15 06:00, wrote: No. Sorry to cut you off mid-sentence, but reality check - you don't care! Get on the air. Bash some DX. Turn the wick up and HAVE FUN! That's what ballsy amps are for. Stop
/archives//html/Amps/2015-08/msg00015.html (8,341 bytes)

30. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 152, Issue 9 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 08:10:33 +1200
On 12/08/15 04:00, wrote: You've saved the planet, Manfred! We're indebted to you once again - teaching us a new thing, and now planet saving! Just wow! 8-D We luv ya! Be that man! 8-D That is what I
/archives//html/Amps/2015-08/msg00025.html (10,236 bytes)

31. Re: [Amps] Moderator?? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 23:15:50 +1200
What's the problem, Jim? How do you feel? Steve someone _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2015-08/msg00037.html (7,015 bytes)

32. Re: [Amps] Finale: Time to ask for help. (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 22:35:19 +1200
I got a mate who built a 80-10m HF amp out of six sweep tubes. That amp was a labour of love - because he wanted to do what he wanted, and ya know sometimes thats what counts the most! He ran into to
/archives//html/Amps/2015-08/msg00066.html (7,784 bytes)

33. Re: [Amps] Regulated filament current (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 15:58:40 +1200
On 05/09/15 04:00, I was looking at similar using a programmable switching supply. Once the tube warms up fully, the current will normally drop off - except in your case it won't be doing that. Also,
/archives//html/Amps/2015-09/msg00017.html (8,550 bytes)

34. Re: [Amps] Regulated filament current (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 07:25:59 +1200
On 07/09/15 04:00, wrote: Ha! We'd just have a separate generator just to run filaments! 8-) Steve _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/Amps/2015-09/msg00022.html (8,506 bytes)

35. Re: [Amps] Regulated filament current (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 08:05:20 +1200
On 08/09/15 04:00, And this is exactly the type of thing I was meaning in an earlier post. Sometimes, well-meant, and on-the-face-of-it very clever ideas end up discovering the hard way that tube is
/archives//html/Amps/2015-09/msg00025.html (8,714 bytes)

36. Re: [Amps] TX3X (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 08:54:52 +1300
I worked him mobile on 40m with 100W and a helical whip. 5/9 both ways. ;) ZL1BHD _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai
/archives//html/Amps/2015-10/msg00016.html (6,424 bytes)

37. [Amps] GS-35b 10M+6M dual-band (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 19:46:39 +1300
GS35b dual-band 10/6M amp? Any comments? Google can't find me a good example of one of these, which is surprising.. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.c
/archives//html/Amps/2015-11/msg00002.html (6,696 bytes)

38. Re: [Amps] GS-35b 10M+6M dual-band (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 06:57:59 +1300
Bill, Thanks for your tips! I did seem to me that 10M would just be a few more turns on the tank, and it seems now that 12/15 is just a few more turns! I doubt I'd try for 40M as well - it's just not
/archives//html/Amps/2015-11/msg00009.html (9,697 bytes)

39. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 155, Issue 11 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 07:17:13 +1300
I do not read any specs except the output power. I will never repair my 2K myself. I enjoy its results and smile while I get 'em first call. 73, Charly Haha, yeah! What is the fixation with IMD and t
/archives//html/Amps/2015-11/msg00059.html (7,004 bytes)

40. Re: [Amps] Amp Layout (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 06:43:02 +1300
http://s900.photobucket.com/user/w7ry/library/8877%20Amplifier Beeeooootiful! _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman
/archives//html/Amps/2015-11/msg00072.html (7,254 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
This search system is powered by Namazu