- 1. Re: [Amps] Harris RF 102A (score: 1)
- Author: ros <ros@netbox.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 21:51:47 -0600
- Do you want to sell it? I cud use it for parts. Ros, W5BRY Sent from Samsung tablet -- Original message -- From Jack Taylor <jack@n7oo.com> Date: 02/10/2014 2:27 PM (GMT-06:00) To amps@contesting.com
- /archives//html/Amps/2014-02/msg00090.html (6,760 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Amps] Alpha 76PA (score: 1)
- Author: Ros <ros@netbox.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 20:49:52 -0500
- Why not do both? Sell the tubes and sell the amp. for a good price so that folks could put different tube/s in it? Ros We are trying to decide on an asking price. Or would it be better to part it out
- /archives//html/Amps/2015-07/msg00084.html (7,491 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Amps] Alpha 76PA (score: 1)
- Author: Ros <ros@netbox.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 22:28:06 -0500
- I and I suspect plenty of others would buy a tubeless amp. depending upon varying factors. Ros Alpha 76PA not sure to part thinking of we don't _______________________________________________ Amps ma
- /archives//html/Amps/2015-07/msg00086.html (9,125 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Amps] HV transformer and Variac (score: 1)
- Author: Ros <ros@netbox.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 22:15:20 -0500
- First, the Variac is not a transformer in the classical sense, it is an autoformer or auto-trans-former. It will not lose efficiency. Here is a schematic of one and perhaps you can see why it won't l
- /archives//html/Amps/2015-07/msg00101.html (11,207 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Amps] HV transformer and Variac (score: 1)
- Author: Ros <ros@netbox.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:12:19 -0500
- Semantic, Gary. My e.e. school said it is not a transformer in the classic sense -"trans" as in transforming one voltage/current ratio into another with the added benefit of isolation which the autof
- /archives//html/Amps/2015-07/msg00110.html (13,403 bytes)
- 6. Re: [Amps] HV transformer and Variac (score: 1)
- Author: Ros <ros@netbox.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 21:44:53 -0500
- Have it your way, Don. My ego doesn't require me to go further - your mind is made up. Ros Output VA + core loss + I2R wire loss = Input VA. Nothing magic going on here. Don W4DNR Quoting Ron Youvan
- /archives//html/Amps/2015-07/msg00126.html (11,232 bytes)
- 7. Re: [Amps] Question on installing new Amp tube (score: 1)
- Author: Ros <ros@netbox.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 17:47:22 -0500
- Mike, you are partially correct except the tube doesn't sit around and can no longer emit electrons; it no longer emits electrons because the filament has used up the electrons on the surface from lo
- /archives//html/Amps/2015-08/msg00014.html (13,122 bytes)
- 8. [Amps] EIMACRe: Tube Tester (score: 1)
- Author: "finalact@embarqmail.com" <ros@netbox.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:06:59 -0500
- EIMAC On 6/10/2016 9:38 AM, Scott via Amps wrote: Hi Joe, I have used them this year to test a few 8874s and 3cx800's and found them to be quick, reliable, and the results generally consistent with w
- /archives//html/Amps/2016-06/msg00028.html (9,489 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu