Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:na9d@speakeasy.net: 73 ]

Total 73 documents matching your query.

41. [AMPS] amp control (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 17:59:23 -0500
There is such a device and it is frequently used in VHF/UHF systems. It's called a sequencer. I don't know if anyone has ever adapted them for HF, but what it essentially does is prevent the radio fr
/archives//html/Amps/2001-06/msg00286.html (8,762 bytes)

42. [AMPS] blower (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Sat, 05 May 2001 09:24:56 -0500
He won't do it. He'll refer you to Wes' measurements and say that a piece of HP equipment doesn't lie. Yet, I know for a fact that measurements can be interpreted in a variety of ways. Figures lie an
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00055.html (9,902 bytes)

43. [AMPS] Self oscillation with homebrew 3-1000Z ???? (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 20:17:10 -0500
We also do not know where the oscillation is occurring. Is it in the VHF range? HF? LF? All that's important, because if the oscillation is in the HF or LF frequency ranges, screwing with the VHF par
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00128.html (11,360 bytes)

44. [AMPS] UPDATE ON 3-1000Z OSCILLATION (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 00:33:38 -0500
These R-C networks on the filaments do help. They stopped an oscillation for my amplifier. One person suggested though that they may have helped to stop an LF or HF oscillation rather than a VHF one.
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00151.html (10,084 bytes)

45. [AMPS] UPDATE ON 3-1000Z OSCILLATION (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 12:06:27 -0500
So Dave, Since you "really know" as you point out below, why not dispense with belly-aching about the rest of us ignorant bastards and actually teach us something so that we won't be so pathetic? Wha
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00182.html (9,828 bytes)

46. [AMPS] UPDATE ON 3-1000Z OSCILLATION (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 12:08:53 -0500
Tom, That's a great point. So far Dave has just told us we are all wrong. I can't wait to actually learn some of the knowledge and wisdom he has stored up. It will be a day of great learning for me w
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00183.html (9,941 bytes)

47. [AMPS] Conjugate Matching In Class B and C Amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 12:14:12 -0500
Sounds like good articles! W/o having read them, I'll confess that I am at a loss to know the back ground. What is the debate? Also, generally when determining a conjugate match, S-Parameters are use
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00184.html (10,433 bytes)

48. [AMPS] UPDATE ON 3-1000Z OSCILLATION (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 18:16:28 -0500
George, Even that doesn't work. I have a degree from one of the top EE schools in the world - University of Illinois. Specialty was RF. I also spent 6 1/2 years designing Microwave radios and cellula
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00196.html (9,744 bytes)

49. [AMPS] Conjugate Matching In Class B and C Amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 18:18:30 -0500
OK. You are correct Rich. If conjugate match occurs, then an equal amount of power is absorbed by both source and load - hence the 50% efficiency. Conjugate match IS what is needed for maximum power
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00197.html (9,280 bytes)

50. [AMPS] UPDATE ON 3-1000Z OSCILLATION (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 18:23:34 -0500
Oh, Rich, I am not. In fact, I'm not even talking about being an expert here. I've never used the word with regards to myself, you, Tom or anyone else. My point is that Dave, WT8R, has done nothing b
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00198.html (9,891 bytes)

51. [AMPS] UPDATE ON 3-1000Z OSCILLATION (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 22:45:49 -0500
One "side" affect is from laughing so hard at your drivel that my stomach aches! I think the original question to explain "side" effects (and it should be effects not affects) revolved around my anal
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00204.html (12,186 bytes)

52. [AMPS] Nichrome wire and tube chimneys! (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 23:08:03 -0500
I doubt you could cool a 4-1000A or 3-1000A by blowing air across the side of the tube. 73, Jon NA9D -- Jon Ogden NA9D (ex: KE9NA) Member: ARRL, AMSAT, DXCC, NRA http://www.qsl.net/ke9na "A life live
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00229.html (8,783 bytes)

53. [AMPS] Nichrome wire and tube chimneys! (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 08:02:01 -0500
Problem with my DSL line last night caused it. I suppose you could, Rich. However, that would get to be a fairly large fan given the size of a 4-1000 or 3-1000. By that time, it's probably easier to
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00234.html (9,192 bytes)

54. [AMPS] Nichrome wire and tube chimneys! (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 22:33:26 -0500
Perhaps I don't, Rich. And perhaps I am full of BS. But I prefer cooling systems that work in the direction of natural convection of heat. Heat flows up. So something that blows cool air over somethi
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00245.html (9,684 bytes)

55. [AMPS] Nichrome wire and tube chimneys! (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 09:27:19 -0500
Also, some people have said that centrifugal blowers are hard to find. I see numerous blowers at every hamfest I go to. They aren't that rare. Yet I've never seen a muffin fan as big or bigger than a
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00256.html (10,034 bytes)

56. [AMPS] Conjugate Matching In Class B and C Amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 22:42:57 -0500
Conjugate matching is not required for unconditional stability. That's incorrect. Many low noise amplifiers are purposely mismatched because simultaneous conjugate match generally does not equal mini
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00298.html (11,226 bytes)

57. [AMPS] Conjugate Matching In Class B and C Amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 10:22:50 -0500
A simultaneous conjugate match is unconditionally stable. However, any other match may be unconditionally stable as well. Unconditional stability is not just so simple as defining a match at one freq
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00310.html (10,778 bytes)

58. [AMPS] Conjugate Matching In Class B and C Amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 10:23:33 -0500
Rich, Your name is coming across as "2" Are you wishing to hide your identity? Jon -- Jon Ogden NA9D (ex: KE9NA) Member: ARRL, AMSAT, DXCC, NRA http://www.qsl.net/ke9na "A life lived in fear is a lif
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00311.html (8,845 bytes)

59. [AMPS] Conjugate Matching and Efficiency (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 00:28:56 -0500
After noodling all of the ideas tossed back and forth regarding conjugate matching and efficiency, I have come up with the following simplifications to try to clarify the idea. If there are any error
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00325.html (12,076 bytes)

60. [AMPS] Conjugate Matching and Efficiency (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 07:34:32 -0500
Hi Billy, I've been trying long and hard to come up with a "scientific" answer to your point and have been consulting with others as well as noodling it around in my head. Let's see how this works. I
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00402.html (14,751 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu