Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kk7uv@bresnan.net: 64 ]

Total 64 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [Amps] Discrepencies in Pi-net calculators (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 16:37:52 -0700
28.03MHz. However Group 1 has a Q of 1.9, Group 2 has Q of >>4.7, and Group 3 has Q of 2.7 according to my understanding of nodal Q. I used the same variable values for each tool, including a specif
/archives//html/Amps/2013-11/msg00399.html (8,434 bytes)

62. Re: [Amps] Discrepencies in Pi-net calculators (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:53:52 -0700
As mentioned, I am not attempting to design a specific network per se, or even determine which method is most popular. I suppose this is an academic exercise to explore why the differences exist. Gro
/archives//html/Amps/2013-11/msg00402.html (8,075 bytes)

63. Re: [Amps] Discrepencies in Pi-net calculators (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:02:10 -0700
Thanks Carl! The Wingfield article is terrific and satisfies my curiosity. 73, Steve KK7VU _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contestin
/archives//html/Amps/2013-11/msg00408.html (8,416 bytes)

64. Re: [Amps] Need for bias switch (CW/SSB) (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 06:36:07 -0700
I have an adjustable bias where I can run a little ZSAC for Class AB. But I can dial the bias until it *just* cuts off and I often use this setting for CW. What class am I running when I do so? I've
/archives//html/Amps/2016-01/msg00011.html (8,238 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 64
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]
This search system is powered by Namazu