Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kenw2dtc@comcast.net: 146 ]

Total 146 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [Amps] WLW 500 kW transmitter (score: 1)
Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 20:39:09 -0400
For you WLW fans, I would like to share a webpage that my friend WA2WHV created: http://www.j-hawkins.com/wlw.shtml 73, Ken W2DTC _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amp
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00164.html (7,261 bytes)

62. Re: [Amps] WLW 500 kW transmitter (score: 1)
Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 21:39:17 -0400
Thanks Will, Yes, I culled out just the WLW pages to answer the mail. Jim has created a wonderful website on many major transmitting stations. I reference his main page here for those on this list th
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00167.html (8,989 bytes)

63. Re: [Amps] Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 12:20:16 -0400
A comment was made about contesting: "to generate the cleanest and most narrow signal to punch through the pile-up in a contest". I agree with that guy. It's been my experience that between contests
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00192.html (10,386 bytes)

64. Re: [Amps] Henry 8K (score: 1)
Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 13:52:49 -0400
"Who's going to stop me if I decide to run a vintage undampened 15KW spark CW station and be heard on 160, 80, 40 simultaneously?" **Just about everybody, because you will be causing deliberate inter
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00227.html (8,294 bytes)

65. Re: [Amps] WLW 500 kW transmitter (score: 1)
Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 10:43:09 -0400
Joe, In your short drive you passed a lot of history. Yep, next time you will probably have your camera at the ready. 73, Ken W2DTC ______________________________________ I went by the old VOA site.
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00266.html (8,430 bytes)

66. Re: [Amps] VOA Transmitters.... (score: 1)
Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 10:48:34 -0400
"I got a full tour of the BBC/Deutsche Welle relay site on the island of Antigua" "Fortunately I took a lot of photos" **Dennis, are any of these photos on a webpage? 73, Ken W2DTC __________________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00276.html (6,970 bytes)

67. Re: [Amps] R. MEASURES PRAYERS ANSWERED (score: 1)
Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 19:09:31 -0400
On Jun 3, 2006, at 10:48 AM, W7RY wrote: "I sure wish Good Guy Ham would sign his emails... (That is just common courtesy). It sure would be nice to know who he is" Yes, who is he? Is he really a ham
/archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00068.html (9,634 bytes)

68. Re: [Amps] R. MEASURES PRAYERS ANSWERED (score: 1)
Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 13:15:22 -0400
"I'm sure he is a good guy and he will ID on his next email 73, Ken W2DTC" "Yes Ken, I am a good guy. Maybe too good as some say. 73 Louie" I thought so Louie, your many contributions on here are wel
/archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00170.html (8,456 bytes)

69. Re: [Amps] re :NIB HeathKit Amp (score: 1)
Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 21:11:39 -0400
KR4DA wrote: "it's WORTH more as a unbuilt kit then assembled" With that thought in mind: I attended the Rochester Hamfest last year and this caught my eye: a guy actually took a working DX-60 and UN
/archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00411.html (7,688 bytes)

70. Re: [Amps] QRO membership revoked (score: 1)
Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:59:24 -0400
"I just spent four days of transmitting with less than 26 watts" Fear not, the government has many programs for the disadvantaged. Perhaps there is one for those who are RF challenged. 73, Ken W2DTC
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00525.html (7,737 bytes)

71. Re: [Amps] Crowbar that HV! (score: 1)
Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:29:42 -0400
of energy it holds when charged to 5 kV is frankly scary"< In human terms of being scared, 5 kV at 130 uF should be the same scared as 5 kV at 30 uF. In transmitter terms, I think a safely designed
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00682.html (7,167 bytes)

72. Re: [Amps] QRO membership revoked (score: 1)
Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:55:56 -0400
Peter said: "My father in law worked at HF tx stations running many hundreds of kW in total. A photo of him is extant, showing him on night duty, asleep in a chair with his feet up on another chair"
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00770.html (8,166 bytes)

73. Re: [Amps] QRO membership revoked (score: 1)
Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:02:45 -0400
everyone is running sufficient power. 73, Ken W2DTC _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00867.html (9,165 bytes)

74. Re: [Amps] 572B grid (score: 1)
Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 13:07:02 -0400
"I've never understood the raison d'etre for the introduction of the 572B. I gather it was meant as a cheap SSB tube" Perhaps this tech bulletin from 1964 will explain: http://w2dtc.com/1964-waters-t
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00948.html (8,474 bytes)

75. Re: [Amps] 572B grid (score: 1)
Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:02:11 -0400
"This is very interesting, because it contradicts what I've believed: that the 572B offers no additional power output over the 811A unless you raise the plate voltage" Good question. I've included th
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg00954.html (8,350 bytes)

76. Re: [Amps] plexiglas isolation in coils (score: 1)
Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:41:29 -0400
W6TR wrote: "Mighty Fine Junk that Ameritron. I don't know why you guys buy that s--t. Don't give me that "good amp for the price" speech because it makes Heathkit amp owners mad cuz they have do hav
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01247.html (9,820 bytes)

77. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1)
Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 05:42:56 -0400
W6TR said: "My, I seem to have tweaked a sensitive spot with all you ameritron lovers(not capitalized on purpose). I can see where appliance operators would love them, just buy it, bring it home and
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01277.html (7,104 bytes)

78. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1)
Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 10:46:18 -0400
http://w2dtc.com/w2dtc-radio-station-equipment/2006-0625-linear-amps.jpg I've been running an AL-1500 on 160, an Al-1200 on 75 and another AL-1200 on 40 in the AM mode for 5 years. No problems. Rich,
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01294.html (8,163 bytes)

79. [Amps] I need coil clips (score: 1)
Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 03:01:26 -0400
HI, I need 5 clips for attaching to a broadcast transmitter edge wound inductor. Where can I purchase these items? See attached photo: http://w2dtc.com/2006-0903-coil-clip.jpg 73, Ken W2DTC kenw2dtc@
/archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00052.html (6,542 bytes)

80. [Amps] Fw: I need coil clips (score: 1)
Author: "kenw2dtc" <kenw2dtc@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 10:28:18 -0400
Thanks to all that replied. I sent an email to Cardwell and got an answer right back. I then phoned the company and placed my order. The correct part number for the inductor clip is 235-807-1. They a
/archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00059.html (6,435 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
This search system is powered by Namazu