Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat@copper.net: 220 ]

Total 220 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [Amps] What exactly is a GDO ? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 07:21:21 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Same thing, sorry for the confusion. Grid Dip Meter = Grid Dip Oscillator Often the name itself is wrong because newer ones use transistors which have no grid
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00091.html (7,904 bytes)

182. Re: [Amps] Grid Vs cathode drive (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 09:33:52 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Interesting that this should come up. I have often thought that if the FCC rule did not exist, there would be "exciters" with about five watts output and all a
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00097.html (8,536 bytes)

183. Re: [Amps] What exactly is a GDO ? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 09:49:39 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Yes, I have one too. But saying "gate dip" just doesn't sound right to an old you-know-what like me. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00098.html (7,701 bytes)

184. Re: [Amps] Grid Vs cathode drive (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 10:12:37 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Those of us on the amps reflector consider 100 watts QRP. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00145.html (9,296 bytes)

185. Re: [Amps] Grid Vs cathode drive (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 12:21:51 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- There already was a UHF CB before 27 MHz. As I recall it was on 465 MHz, but with the technology of the day it was pretty crude and not popular. When 11 meters
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00147.html (8,597 bytes)

186. Re: [Amps] off topic---how do I unsubscribe? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 12:27:25 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Post a message about parasitics. It will be done for you. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com htt
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00148.html (7,418 bytes)

187. Re: [Amps] grid resonance (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 13:08:36 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Yes, I am. What you apparently do not understand is how a GDO works. The dip is created by the parallel resonant circuit absorbing power from the GDO's oscilla
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00150.html (10,119 bytes)

188. Re: [Amps] GS-35B on 6 meters (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:55:33 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- I wondered about this. Why connect to the cooling fins when you can easily connect directly to the anode itself? I just made the connection to a lug under the
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00153.html (7,542 bytes)

189. Re: [Amps] GS-35B on 6 meters (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 09:13:19 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- You misunderstand. I ddin't remove the fins at all, only the bolt that holds them in place. The cooling is not affected by the presence or absence of the bolt;
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00210.html (8,308 bytes)

190. Re: [Amps] grid resonance (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 09:50:51 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- When you include the car body, it is a parallel resonant circuit, not series. The whip is electromagnetically coupled to the car body and that makes it paralle
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00213.html (10,460 bytes)

191. Re: [Amps] grid resonance (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 09:57:16 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- I can't believe you would say such a thing, Peter. Perhaps I missed the smiley face? :-) You are confusing the current within a component with the current with
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00214.html (8,996 bytes)

192. Re: [Amps] Options (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 10:08:19 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- I'd suggest testing the tubes first before building the amp around them. Since you are going to build the power supply anyway, do that first. Then rig up a tem
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00220.html (8,282 bytes)

193. Re: [Amps] grid resonance (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 09:10:47 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Nope, it is still series resonant. Tap dance all you want, a series resonant circuit will not "dip" with a GDO unless you rewire it as a parallel circuit. Just
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00261.html (9,971 bytes)

194. Re: [Amps] grid resonance (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 09:23:53 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- A GDO "deceptive". I could not disagree more. Assuming the GDO is designed properly, what is says is happening really is. In all fairness, I have seen one GDO
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00262.html (8,980 bytes)

195. Re: [Amps] Estate sale - CB Gear... w2cqm traders net (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 09:28:25 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- As long as it's amp related, I don't mind. When people start listing their baseball cards, stamps or old coins, I draw the line. :-) Bill, W6WRT ______________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00296.html (7,880 bytes)

196. Re: [Amps] Tuned Input - IMD and efficiency (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 09:34:20 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Since most modern transceivers have a built in antenna tuner, I wonder how well that works in place of a dedicated tuned input? Has anyone made such a comparis
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00297.html (9,722 bytes)

197. Re: [Amps] grid resonance (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 09:49:05 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Please guys, this is how flame wars start. There is nothing at all "magic" about nichrome wire. It's characteristics and usage have been explained in great det
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00300.html (9,363 bytes)

198. Re: [Amps] grid resonance (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 10:41:21 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: <snip> -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Precisely. Thank you Joe. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00302.html (8,794 bytes)

199. Re: [Amps] Tuned Input - IMD and efficiency (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:20:10 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- This makes perfect sense. Rich recommends a 33pF in series with a ten ohm resistor directly from grid to cathode with short leads. That is what I used in my 88
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00350.html (10,781 bytes)

200. Re: [Amps] Fw: grid resonance (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:22:05 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Which horse? The discussion horse or the whining about the discussion horse? Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00351.html (7,382 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
This search system is powered by Namazu