Mail Archive Search: <+from:QROKING@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:QROKING@aol.com: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] more dbs (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 08:46:23 -0500 (EST); ITS A SLUG FEST OUT THERE! AND THE GUY WITH THE MOST POWERFUL WEAPONS WINS!!! DO BOUT ADOUT IT....(PUN INTENTED) ALSO DB'S ARE LIKE INCHES.....WE ALL WANT MORE.....NOW LET ME SEE, WHERE DID I PUT THA; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00060.html (6,718 bytes)
2. [AMPS] HV SAG (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Sun, 13 Apr 1997 06:42:49 -0400 (EDT); Hello Hakan, I am still here. As you know I got alot of techni-blaa-blaa about the HV sag. Seems as though everything is in order here, but still have the problem, the monster amp is off line now any; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00166.html (7,353 bytes)
3. [AMPS] BIG power on 30 meters (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 21:50:29 -0400 (EDT); Hi Gang, Well to tell you the truth, I dont give a rats ass about how much power anybody runs on 30 meters. Many have spoken out on the power limits on this band. For all those out there who this con; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00200.html (7,343 bytes)
4. [AMPS] 30 meter POWER (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 07:26:10 -0400 (EDT); Hi, there has been some real nice flames posted to my 30 meter power issue. It seems we do have some people out there who NEVER go faster than 55 and who probibly ALWAYS come to a full stop at stop s; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00210.html (8,280 bytes)
5. [AMPS] 30 meter power (policemen) (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 19:14:56 -0400 (EDT); Mr Gerba......Dont they have a 700 club reflector you may be interested in? -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00230.html (6,635 bytes)
6. [AMPS] 30 meter power issues (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 00:28:39 -0400 (EDT); Gentlemen, (YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE)..... At least I make my comments in the light of this forum for all to appreciate or maliciously disagree with! I would exspect that you do the same or are you fella; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00234.html (7,287 bytes)
7. [AMPS] 4CX15000 Amp.???? (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 00:23:48 -0400 (EDT); Kudos Bob! Get your lawyer working! Maybe more guys will start homebrewing amps, like the good ole days! Tetdrodes with handles for the homebrewer, I can see the headlines now........73 LOU -- FAQ on; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00266.html (7,771 bytes)
8. [AMPS] 4CX15000 Amp.???? (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 00:35:25 -0400 (EDT); Mike, Forget the FCC getting in on this, we have our share of DX COPS and RELECTOR COPS right here. As a matter of fact, the FCC is pushing for ham policeing of the rules! Check it out in QST this mo; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00267.html (8,168 bytes)
9. [AMPS] 4CX15000 Amp.???? (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 00:44:45 -0400 (EDT); Great post John, but be prepared to take a beating for the 700 club crack! My eye is still swollen from a militant member of that group. 73 LOU -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Su; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00268.html (7,705 bytes)
10. [AMPS] 1500 w dissipation limit (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 01:10:34 -0400 (EDT); OK....this issue is really taking hold.....Now which one of you are going to push for "TYPE ACCEPTANCE" of homebrew amplifiers? I dare you! 73 LOU -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00269.html (7,207 bytes)
11. [AMPS] 1500 Watts of Disipation - Is that fair? (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 01:16:05 -0400 (EDT); Robert, People kill for less than that! Be careful........73 LOU -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00270.html (7,053 bytes)
12. [AMPS] 1500 w dissipation limit (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 01:42:05 -0400 (EDT); John, Thank God I am not alone! I have been getting beat up on this, but somebody has finally come to my rescue, you have restored my faith in mankind unlike some others I know here. 73 LOU -- FAQ on; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00271.html (7,238 bytes)
13. [AMPS] Speaking of transformers (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 08:02:19 -0400 (EDT); Hi, Seems as though most linears come with tapped primary input transformers. Has anybody opted to use the 220volt tap instead of the 240 volt tap in efforts to squeeze a little more plate voltage? I; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00276.html (6,977 bytes)
14. [AMPS] Lets chew on this (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 00:26:46 -0500 (EST); Ok fellas, our gracious host would like us to start some stuff to hash over about amps and the like. How about this issue? the FCC rule on power used to be 2KW pep input. Now the rule is 1.5KW output; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00019.html (9,173 bytes)
15. [AMPS] LETS CHEW EVEN MORE (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 23:23:17 -0500 (EST); Ok. so back to PEP power.....so what is PEP power? Is it such a big deal? Does it mean a whole lot? Many of us use the term PEP power, but do we really know where it comes from and how? Well lets see; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00048.html (9,720 bytes)
16. [AMPS] LETS CHEW SOME MORE! (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 23:35:15 -0500 (EST); Well we got some very interesting responses to "chew on this"...I LIKE that. OK so lets do some more chewing. You may or may not agree with me so air your views to amps@contesting.com, do not e-mail; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00049.html (8,198 bytes)
17. [AMPS] SWR (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Thu, 6 Mar 1997 01:32:05 -0500 (EST); Ok, so WC1M thinks that if an accurate signal measurement can be made with the 1:1 swr antenna without a tuner verses a 3:1 antenna with a tuner the signal strength would be equal. Well I disagree be; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00057.html (7,228 bytes)
18. [AMPS] How about this? (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Thu, 6 Mar 1997 01:53:01 -0500 (EST); How about this? The question came up before about reflected power being dissapated as HEAT someplace. At the tube plate? in the tuner? OK so what, the question is...Is in fact the reflected power goi; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00060.html (7,356 bytes)
19. [AMPS] so where's the POWER (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Thu, 6 Mar 1997 07:42:47 -0500 (EST); Good morning gentlemen!!! Well I got a good nights sleep, but all night I was dreaming about where that reflected power goes, and if we assume we know where it goes, can we proove it. If we make a st; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00063.html (10,391 bytes)
20. [AMPS] MORE ON PEP (TOM) (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Fri, 7 Mar 1997 08:30:54 -0500 (EST); Tom, mentioned in a response to my mathmatical attempt to prove that PEP power is twice the average power. In his response he made mention of the term PEAK RMS value. This is an ambiguous statement,; /archives//html/Amps/1997-03/msg00076.html (9,037 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]